rs149282954
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_006269.2(RP1):c.6196G>A(p.Asp2066Asn) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00041 in 1,613,820 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00038 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00041 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
RP1
NM_006269.2 missense
NM_006269.2 missense
Scores
4
3
12
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.73
Genes affected
RP1 (HGNC:10263): (RP1 axonemal microtubule associated) This gene encodes a member of the doublecortin family. The protein encoded by this gene contains two doublecortin domains, which bind microtubules and regulate microtubule polymerization. The encoded protein is a photoreceptor microtubule-associated protein and is required for correct stacking of outer segment disc. This protein and the RP1L1 protein, another retinal-specific protein, play essential and synergistic roles in affecting photosensitivity and outer segment morphogenesis of rod photoreceptors. Because of its response to in vivo retinal oxygen levels, this protein was initially named ORP1 (oxygen-regulated protein-1). This protein was subsequently designated RP1 (retinitis pigmentosa 1) when it was found that mutations in this gene cause autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Mutations in this gene also cause autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Transcript variants resulted from an alternative promoter and alternative splicings have been found, which overlap the current reference sequence and has several exons upstream and downstream of the current reference sequence. However, the biological validity and full-length nature of some variants cannot be determined at this time.[provided by RefSeq, Sep 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.13357884).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RP1 | NM_006269.2 | c.6196G>A | p.Asp2066Asn | missense_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000220676.2 | NP_006260.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RP1 | ENST00000220676.2 | c.6196G>A | p.Asp2066Asn | missense_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_006269.2 | ENSP00000220676.1 | ||
RP1 | ENST00000637698.1 | c.787+7790G>A | intron_variant | 5 | ENSP00000490104.1 | |||||
RP1 | ENST00000636932.1 | c.787+7790G>A | intron_variant | 5 | ENSP00000489857.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000381 AC: 58AN: 152084Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
58
AN:
152084
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000498 AC: 125AN: 251020Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000494 AC XY: 67AN XY: 135700
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
125
AN:
251020
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
67
AN XY:
135700
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000413 AC: 603AN: 1461618Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000428 AC XY: 311AN XY: 727094
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
603
AN:
1461618
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
311
AN XY:
727094
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000381 AC: 58AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000349 AC XY: 26AN XY: 74408
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
58
AN:
152202
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
74408
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
AC:
58
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 07, 2014 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 19, 2024 | This sequence change replaces aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, with asparagine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 2066 of the RP1 protein (p.Asp2066Asn). This variant is present in population databases (rs149282954, gnomAD 0.07%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (PMID: 11527933). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 197270). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Retinitis pigmentosa 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Jan 09, 2019 | - - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Benign
T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T
M_CAP
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Pathogenic
D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
D
Polyphen
D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at