Menu
GeneBe

rs149318176

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_017890.5(VPS13B):c.11270G>A(p.Arg3757Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00159 in 1,595,114 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R3757W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

VPS13B
NM_017890.5 missense

Scores

4
4
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.48
Variant links:
Genes affected
VPS13B (HGNC:2183): (vacuolar protein sorting 13 homolog B) This gene encodes a potential transmembrane protein that may function in vesicle-mediated transport and sorting of proteins within the cell. This protein may play a role in the development and the function of the eye, hematological system, and central nervous system. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Cohen syndrome. Multiple splice variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.021757007).
BP6
Variant 8-99861926-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-99861926-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 198013.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=3, Benign=1, Likely_benign=9}. Variant chr8-99861926-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
VPS13BNM_017890.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.11270G>A p.Arg3757Gln missense_variant 58/62 ENST00000358544.7
VPS13BNM_152564.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.11195G>A p.Arg3732Gln missense_variant 58/62 ENST00000357162.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
VPS13BENST00000358544.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.11270G>A p.Arg3757Gln missense_variant 58/621 NM_017890.5 Q7Z7G8-1
VPS13BENST00000357162.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.11195G>A p.Arg3732Gln missense_variant 58/621 NM_152564.5 P1Q7Z7G8-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00191
AC:
291
AN:
152062
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000507
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00576
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00437
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00206
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00383
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00186
AC:
396
AN:
213012
Hom.:
4
AF XY:
0.00223
AC XY:
257
AN XY:
115014
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000233
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00257
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00130
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00403
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000575
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00191
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00243
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00156
AC:
2252
AN:
1442934
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00167
AC XY:
1194
AN XY:
715874
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000541
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00280
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000897
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000180
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00400
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000988
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00146
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00169
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00191
AC:
291
AN:
152180
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00202
AC XY:
150
AN XY:
74378
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000506
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00576
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00437
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00206
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00379
Alfa
AF:
0.00140
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00180
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00135
AC:
5
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00104
AC:
4
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00268
AC:
23
ExAC
AF:
0.00155
AC:
187
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cohen syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Dec 25, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoMar 30, 2021VPS13B NM_017890.4 exon 58 p.Arg3757Gln (c.11270G>A): This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in 0.4% (108/26824) of South Asian alleles, including 2 homozygotes in the Genome Aggregation Database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/8-100874154-G-A). This variant is present in ClinVar (Variation ID:198013). Evolutionary conservation suggests that this variant may impact the protein; computational predictive tools for this variant are unclear. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabMay 18, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNew York Genome CenterOct 19, 2021- -
not provided Benign:7
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsApr 23, 2019- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJan 01, 2024VPS13B: BS2 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 16, 2019- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Feb 11, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJan 22, 2019- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 10, 2023This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
VPS13B-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesNov 25, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.24
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.17
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.020
Cadd
Pathogenic
27
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.74
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.77
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.90
D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.058
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.022
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.35
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.73
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.42
Sift
Benign
0.18
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.072
T;T
Polyphen
1.0
D;D
Vest4
0.77
MVP
0.75
MPC
0.36
ClinPred
0.026
T
GERP RS
5.8
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.22
gMVP
0.89

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149318176; hg19: chr8-100874154; API