rs149338158
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_001848.3(COL6A1):āc.1115A>Gā(p.Glu372Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000414 in 1,613,000 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001848.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL6A1 | NM_001848.3 | c.1115A>G | p.Glu372Gly | missense_variant | 15/35 | ENST00000361866.8 | NP_001839.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL6A1 | ENST00000361866.8 | c.1115A>G | p.Glu372Gly | missense_variant | 15/35 | 1 | NM_001848.3 | ENSP00000355180 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000309 AC: 47AN: 152128Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000303 AC: 76AN: 250472Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000302 AC XY: 41AN XY: 135730
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000424 AC: 620AN: 1460754Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000417 AC XY: 303AN XY: 726666
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000309 AC: 47AN: 152246Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000296 AC XY: 22AN XY: 74442
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:4Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 29, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 27, 2023 | Observed as heterozygous variant in two individuals with clinically suspected limb-girdle muscular dystrophy; however, the authors classified E372G as a variant of uncertain significance (Nallamilli et al., 2018); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30564623) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Aug 21, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Nov 26, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | May 04, 2023 | - - |
Collagen 6-related myopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Bethlem myopathy 1A Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 22, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at