rs149369116

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_000093.5(COL5A1):c.126C>T(p.Leu42Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00074 in 1,613,792 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00040 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00078 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

COL5A1
NM_000093.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.10

Variant links:

Genes affected

COL5A1 (HGNC:2209): (collagen type V alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes an alpha chain for one of the low abundance fibrillar collagens. Fibrillar collagen molecules are trimers that can be composed of one or more types of alpha chains. Type V collagen is found in tissues containing type I collagen and appears to regulate the assembly of heterotypic fibers composed of both type I and type V collagen. This gene product is closely related to type XI collagen and it is possible that the collagen chains of types V and XI constitute a single collagen type with tissue-specific chain combinations. The encoded procollagen protein occurs commonly as the heterotrimer pro-alpha1(V)-pro-alpha1(V)-pro-alpha2(V). Mutations in this gene are associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, types I and II. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

COL5A1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).

BP6

Variant 9-134690928-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-134690928-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 212915.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr9-134690928-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.1 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0004 (61/152374) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000794 (54/68042). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000625. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 32 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 61 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL5A1	NM_000093.5 link	c.126C>T	p.Leu42Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 66	ENST00000371817.8	NP_000084.3	P20908-1A0A024R8E5B2ZZ86Q59EE7
COL5A1	NM_001278074.1 link	c.126C>T	p.Leu42Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 66		NP_001265003.1	B2ZZ86Q59EE7
COL5A1	XM_017014266.3 link	c.126C>T	p.Leu42Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 65		XP_016869755.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL5A1	ENST00000371817.8 link	c.126C>T	p.Leu42Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 66	1	NM_000093.5	ENSP00000360882.3	P20908-1
COL5A1	ENST00000371820.4 link	c.126C>T	p.Leu42Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 66	2		ENSP00000360885.4	P20908-2H7BY82
COL5A1	ENST00000464187.1 link	n.312C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 6	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000401

AC:

AN:

152256

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000121

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000941

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000794

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000491

AC:

123

AN:

250440

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000516

AC XY:

AN XY:

135600

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000124

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000347

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000359

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000832

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000490

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000775

AC:

1133

AN:

1461418

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000761

AC XY:

553

AN XY:

726984

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000119

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000358

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000243

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000755

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000958

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000364

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000400

AC:

AN:

152374

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000429

AC XY:

AN XY:

74516

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000120

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0000941

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000794

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000474

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000378

EpiCase

AF:

0.000654

EpiControl

AF:

0.000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Mar 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

COL5A1: BP4, BP7 -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 22, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Dec 05, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Aug 24, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 7A

Uncertain:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:1

Mar 24, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

Benign:1

Jul 07, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1

Benign:1

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.47

CADD

Benign

8.1

DANN

Benign

0.53

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over