rs149391489

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4BP6BS1BS2

The NM_000169.3(GLA):​c.376A>G​(p.Ser126Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00055 in 1,207,539 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 221 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00040 ( 0 hom., 10 hem., cov: 23)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00057 ( 0 hom. 211 hem. )

Consequence

GLA
NM_000169.3 missense

Scores

5
6
7

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.56
Variant links:
Genes affected
GLA (HGNC:4296): (galactosidase alpha) This gene encodes a homodimeric glycoprotein that hydrolyses the terminal alpha-galactosyl moieties from glycolipids and glycoproteins. This enzyme predominantly hydrolyzes ceramide trihexoside, and it can catalyze the hydrolysis of melibiose into galactose and glucose. A variety of mutations in this gene affect the synthesis, processing, and stability of this enzyme, which causes Fabry disease, a rare lysosomal storage disorder that results from a failure to catabolize alpha-D-galactosyl glycolipid moieties. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
RPL36A-HNRNPH2 (HGNC:48349): (RPL36A-HNRNPH2 readthrough) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring ribosomal protein L36a and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H2 (H') genes on chromosome X. The read-through transcript produces a protein with similarity to the protein encoded by the upstream locus, ribosomal protein L36a. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.36750877).
BP6
Variant X-101401803-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-101401803-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 163547.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=11, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chrX-101401803-T-C is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic]. Variant chrX-101401803-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000401 (45/112278) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000769 (41/53300). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000582. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 10 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 23. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 10 Mitochondrial gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GLANM_000169.3 linkc.376A>G p.Ser126Gly missense_variant Exon 3 of 7 ENST00000218516.4 NP_000160.1 P06280Q53Y83

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GLAENST00000218516.4 linkc.376A>G p.Ser126Gly missense_variant Exon 3 of 7 1 NM_000169.3 ENSP00000218516.4 P06280
RPL36A-HNRNPH2ENST00000409170.3 linkc.300+6346T>C intron_variant Intron 4 of 4 4 ENSP00000386655.4 H7BZ11

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000401
AC:
45
AN:
112278
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.000291
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
34416
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000648
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000769
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000327
AC:
60
AN:
183376
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000324
AC XY:
22
AN XY:
67822
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000760
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000729
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000524
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000684
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000565
AC:
619
AN:
1095261
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.000585
AC XY:
211
AN XY:
360735
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000759
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000142
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000740
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000697
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000370
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000401
AC:
45
AN:
112278
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.000291
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
34416
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000648
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000769
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000763
Hom.:
28
Bravo
AF:
0.000314
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000809
AC:
3
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000692
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000892
AC:
6
ExAC
AF:
0.000461
AC:
56
EpiCase
AF:
0.00115
EpiControl
AF:
0.000771

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Fabry disease Uncertain:2Benign:7
Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 29, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 06, 2021
Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Based on the classification scheme VCGS_Germline_v1.3.4, this variant is classified as likely benign. Following criteria are met: 0308 - Population frequency for this variant is out of keeping with known incidence of Fabry disease (MIM#301500) (gnomAD v2.1.1 - 25 hemizygotes) (SB) 0805 - This variant has strong previous evidence of being benign in unrelated individuals. This variant has previously been reported as benign, likely benign and as a variant of uncertain significance (ClinVar). While this variant has also been reported in patients, population frequency supports this variant being benign (PMIDs:29132836; 31860127; 23935525; 33036343; 20360539). (SB) Legend: (SP) - Supporting pathogenic, (I) - Information, (SB) - Supporting benign -

Jun 25, 2015
Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 12, 2019
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 22, 2020
Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

The p.Ser126Gly variant in GLA has been reported in 3 individuals with Fabry disease, segregated with disease in these 3 affected relatives from one family (PMID: 22905681), and has also been identified in 0.074% (69/92714) of European (non-Finnish) chromosomes, including 24 hemizygotes, by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs149391489). This variant has also been reported in ClinVar as likely benign by the Laboratory for Molecular Medicine (Partners Healthcare), GeneDx, and Ambry Genetics and as a VUS by Division of Genomic Diagnostics (The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia) and Invitae (Variation ID: 163547). In vitro functional studies provide some evidence that the p.Ser126Gly variant may not impact protein function (PMID: 23935525, 11889412, 28646478). However, these types of assays may not accurately represent biological function. Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, while the clinical significance of the p.Ser126Gly variant is uncertain, these data suggest that it is more likely to be benign. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BS1_supporting, BS3_supporting, PP1 (Richards 2015). -

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Jan 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

GLA: BS2 -

Sep 11, 2020
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 11889412, 29132836, 23935525, 24582695, 23219219, 26520229, 26652600, 20360539, 23306324, 23307880, 22905681, 25596309, 25382311, 28646478, 28283366, 28340804, 26990548, 29487688, 27657681, 31860127, 30477121) -

Sep 16, 2018
Gharavi Laboratory, Columbia University
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: research

- -

not specified Benign:3
May 29, 2018
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 06, 2017
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.Ser126Gly variant in GLA has been reported in a 12-year-old male with Fabr y disease, 1 adult female with stroke who had normal alpha-galactosidase levels, 1 female with unspecified clinical information, 1 female toddler with LVNC and arthrogryposis, 1 male toddler with neonatal onset DCM, and 2 adult females with HCM (Branton 2012, De Brabander 2013, Pasqualim 2014, LMM data). It has also be en identified in 0.07% (66/90653) of European chromosomes, including 23 hemizygo tes, in the gnomAD database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs149391489 ). Functional studies indicate that the p.Ser126Gly variant may reduce GLA enzym e function by 50%, but the clinical threshold and impact are not well characteri zed (Lukas 2013). A predictive model developed to determine the pathogenicity of variants in the GLA gene suggests that the p.Ser126Gly variant may not be damag ing (Riera 2015), though this information is not predictive enough to rule out p athogenicity. In summary, while the clinical significance of the p.Ser126Gly var iant is not conclusive, given the population frequency, presence of hemizygotes, inconsistency in phenotype in cases, and residual enzyme activity in functional studies, this variant is likely benign. -

Nov 19, 2024
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: GLA c.376A>G (p.Ser126Gly) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Aldolase class I domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00055 in 1207539 control chromosomes, including 221 hemizygotes. c.376A>G has been identified in the literature without strong evidence for pathogenicity (e.g. Branton_2002, Colon_2017, Reisin_2018). At least one family study showed lack of co-segregation of the variant with the disease (DeBrabander_2013, Reisin_2018). In addition, a functional study found that GLA enzyme activity was reduced by ~50% in vitro, but also found that the lyso-Gb3 biomarker that is typically increased in Fabry patients was at normal levels in patient samples with the variant (Lukas_2013). Another in vitro enzyme activity study showed that the variant retained 83% of WT activity levels (Benjamin_2016). A recent study however, showed no significant reduction in enzymatic activity (Oommen_2019). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 27657681, 11889412, 20360539, 28646478, 23219219, 23935525, 31036492, 24582695, 29132836, 25382311, 30739116, 28340804, 26866599). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 163547). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Feb 17, 2023
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Nov 08, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.074
CardioboostCm
Benign
0.082
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.037
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.23
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.92
D;.
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.86
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.97
D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.95
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.37
T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
1.3
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
2.0
M;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.51
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.8
D;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.66
Sift
Benign
0.060
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.069
T;.
Polyphen
0.043
B;.
Vest4
0.68
MVP
1.0
MPC
0.70
ClinPred
0.050
T
GERP RS
3.5
Varity_R
0.75
gMVP
0.89

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149391489; hg19: chrX-100656791; API