rs149412531

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_001122955.4(BSCL2):​c.448G>A​(p.Val150Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000147 in 1,612,848 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

BSCL2
NM_001122955.4 missense

Scores

2
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.810

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BSCL2 (HGNC:15832): (BSCL2 lipid droplet biogenesis associated, seipin) This gene encodes the multi-pass transmembrane protein protein seipin. This protein localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum and may be important for lipid droplet morphology. Mutations in this gene have been associated with congenital generalized lipodystrophy type 2 or Berardinelli-Seip syndrome, a rare autosomal recessive disease characterized by a near absence of adipose tissue and severe insulin resistance. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. Naturally occurring read-through transcription occurs between this locus and the neighboring locus HNRNPUL2 (heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein U-like 2).[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2011]
HNRNPUL2-BSCL2 (HGNC:49189): (HNRNPUL2-BSCL2 readthrough (NMD candidate)) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring HNRNPUL2 (heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein U-like 2) and BSCL2 (Berardinelli-Seip congenital lipodystrophy 2 (seipin)) genes on chromosome 11. The read-through transcript is a candidate for nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), and is unlikely to produce a protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 5 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 1 benign, 11 uncertain in NM_001122955.4
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.018387109).
BP6
Variant 11-62702506-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-62702506-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 246599.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BSCL2NM_001122955.4 linkc.448G>A p.Val150Ile missense_variant Exon 3 of 11 ENST00000360796.10 NP_001116427.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BSCL2ENST00000360796.10 linkc.448G>A p.Val150Ile missense_variant Exon 3 of 11 1 NM_001122955.4 ENSP00000354032.5
HNRNPUL2-BSCL2ENST00000403734.2 linkn.*499G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 16 of 24 2 ENSP00000456010.1
HNRNPUL2-BSCL2ENST00000403734.2 linkn.*499G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 16 of 24 2 ENSP00000456010.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000112
AC:
17
AN:
152156
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00432
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000378
AC:
95
AN:
251370
AF XY:
0.000368
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00834
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000704
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000151
AC:
220
AN:
1460692
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000172
AC XY:
125
AN XY:
726666
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000299
AC:
1
AN:
33450
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44664
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00686
AC:
179
AN:
26090
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39662
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86238
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53282
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000171
AC:
19
AN:
1111220
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000348
AC:
21
AN:
60324
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12
25
37
50
62
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000112
AC:
17
AN:
152156
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000108
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74338
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41434
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15272
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00432
AC:
15
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5194
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000294
AC:
2
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2090
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.516
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
4
5
6
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000364
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000110
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000255
AC:
31
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Congenital generalized lipodystrophy type 2 Uncertain:2
Mar 31, 2022
New York Genome Center
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Feb 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BSCL2: BP4

Apr 21, 2022
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge

Lipodystrophy Uncertain:1
Jul 30, 2021
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Oct 06, 2023
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Jan 20, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.081
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.069
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.16
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0
.;.;.;T;T;T;.;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.023
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.14
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.59
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.94
D;D;D;.;.;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.014
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.018
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.45
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
.;L;.;L;L;L;.;.;.
PhyloP100
0.81
PrimateAI
Benign
0.45
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.53
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.28
Sift
Benign
0.099
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.22
T;T;T;T;T;T;.;.;.
Vest4
0.19
ClinPred
0.030
T
GERP RS
4.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.049
gMVP
0.37
Mutation Taster
=87/13
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149412531; hg19: chr11-62469978; API