rs149412531

Positions:

chr11-62702506-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_001122955.4(BSCL2):c.448G>A(p.Val150Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000147 in 1,612,848 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

BSCL2
NM_001122955.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.810

Variant links:

Genes affected

BSCL2 (HGNC:15832): (BSCL2 lipid droplet biogenesis associated, seipin) This gene encodes the multi-pass transmembrane protein protein seipin. This protein localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum and may be important for lipid droplet morphology. Mutations in this gene have been associated with congenital generalized lipodystrophy type 2 or Berardinelli-Seip syndrome, a rare autosomal recessive disease characterized by a near absence of adipose tissue and severe insulin resistance. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. Naturally occurring read-through transcription occurs between this locus and the neighboring locus HNRNPUL2 (heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein U-like 2).[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2011]

BSCL2 links:

HNRNPUL2-BSCL2 (HGNC:):

HNRNPUL2-BSCL2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM1

In a hotspot region, there are 3 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 1 benign, 9 uncertain in NM_001122955.4

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.018387109).

BP6

Variant 11-62702506-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-62702506-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 246599.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=5, Likely_benign=1, Benign=1}.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
BSCL2	NM_001122955.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.448G>A	p.Val150Ile	missense_variant	3/11	ENST00000360796.10
HNRNPUL2-BSCL2	NR_037946.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.2968G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	16/24

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
BSCL2	ENST00000360796.10 linkuse as main transcript	c.448G>A	p.Val150Ile	missense_variant	3/11	1	NM_001122955.4	A2	Q96G97-4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152156

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00432

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000378

AC:

AN:

251370

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000368

AC XY:

AN XY:

135878

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00834

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000704

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000151

AC:

220

AN:

1460692

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000172

AC XY:

125

AN XY:

726666

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00686

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000171

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000348

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152156

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000108

AC XY:

AN XY:

74338

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00432

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000375

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000110

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000255

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Mar 01, 2018	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Apr 21, 2022	In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Congenital generalized lipodystrophy type 2

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	New York Genome Center	Mar 31, 2022	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Oct 06, 2023

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Invitae

Jan 02, 2024

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.081

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.069

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.16

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.47

.;.;.;T;T;T;.;T;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.023

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.14

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.59

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.94

D;D;D;.;.;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.014

MetaRNN

Benign

0.018

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.45

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.2

.;L;.;L;L;L;.;.;.

MutationTaster

Benign

0.89

N;N;N;N;N;N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.45

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.53

N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.28

Sift

Benign

0.099

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.22

T;T;T;T;T;T;.;.;.

Polyphen

0.056, 0.53

.;B;.;P;P;P;.;.;.

Vest4

0.19

MVP

0.76

ClinPred

0.030

GERP RS

4.7

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.049

gMVP

0.37

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over