rs149499021

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_004656.4(BAP1):​c.2057-4G>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00756 in 1,567,172 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 60 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0049 ( 8 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0078 ( 52 hom. )

Consequence

BAP1
NM_004656.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0004388
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:19

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.666

Publications

11 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BAP1 (HGNC:950): (BRCA1 associated protein 1) This gene belongs to the ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase subfamily of deubiquitinating enzymes that are involved in the removal of ubiquitin from proteins. The encoded enzyme binds to the breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) via the RING finger domain of the latter and acts as a tumor suppressor. In addition, the enzyme may be involved in regulation of transcription, regulation of cell cycle and growth, response to DNA damage and chromatin dynamics. Germline mutations in this gene may be associated with tumor predisposition syndrome (TPDS), which involves increased risk of cancers including malignant mesothelioma, uveal melanoma and cutaneous melanoma. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]
BAP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Kury-Isidor syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P
  • renal cell carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 3-52402425-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-52402425-C-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 240055.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00491 (748/152332) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00879 (598/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00821. There are 8 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 302 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 748 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BAP1NM_004656.4 linkc.2057-4G>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 16 of 16 ENST00000460680.6 NP_004647.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BAP1ENST00000460680.6 linkc.2057-4G>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 16 of 16 1 NM_004656.4 ENSP00000417132.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00491
AC:
748
AN:
152214
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00164
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00490
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00879
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00526
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00454
AC:
803
AN:
176894
AF XY:
0.00471
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00192
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00455
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00879
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00415
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00785
AC:
11102
AN:
1414840
Hom.:
52
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00783
AC XY:
5486
AN XY:
700206
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00139
AC:
45
AN:
32390
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00107
AC:
40
AN:
37254
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00469
AC:
119
AN:
25390
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
37022
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00119
AC:
97
AN:
81600
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00149
AC:
71
AN:
47674
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000352
AC:
2
AN:
5682
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00958
AC:
10435
AN:
1089128
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00499
AC:
293
AN:
58700
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.484
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
743
1485
2228
2970
3713
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
404
808
1212
1616
2020
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00491
AC:
748
AN:
152332
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00405
AC XY:
302
AN XY:
74488
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00164
AC:
68
AN:
41570
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00137
AC:
21
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00490
AC:
17
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00124
AC:
6
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00104
AC:
11
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00879
AC:
598
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00520
AC:
11
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
43
85
128
170
213
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00561
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00481
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:19
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
May 13, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 28, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Dec 04, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 08, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BAP1: BP4, BS2

Nov 03, 2021
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome Benign:4
Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 18, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance.

Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Mar 09, 2016
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 11, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Mar 13, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Melanoma, uveal, susceptibility to, 2;C3280492:BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome;C5676925:Kury-Isidor syndrome Benign:1
Apr 21, 2022
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Melanoma, uveal, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
0.043
DANN
Benign
0.81
PhyloP100
-0.67
PromoterAI
0.0042
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00044
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.018
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149499021; hg19: chr3-52436441; COSMIC: COSV56237047; API