rs149514924
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 1P and 11B. PP2BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001035.3(RYR2):c.3038G>A(p.Arg1013Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00143 in 1,613,962 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1013W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001035.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics
- catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardiaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, G2P
- catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- hypertrophic cardiomyopathyInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
- arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathyInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYR2 | NM_001035.3 | c.3038G>A | p.Arg1013Gln | missense_variant | Exon 26 of 105 | ENST00000366574.7 | NP_001026.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYR2 | ENST00000366574.7 | c.3038G>A | p.Arg1013Gln | missense_variant | Exon 26 of 105 | 1 | NM_001035.3 | ENSP00000355533.2 | ||
| RYR2 | ENST00000661330.2 | c.3038G>A | p.Arg1013Gln | missense_variant | Exon 26 of 106 | ENSP00000499393.2 | ||||
| RYR2 | ENST00000609119.2 | n.3038G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 26 of 104 | 5 | ENSP00000499659.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000618 AC: 94AN: 152172Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000470 AC: 117AN: 249160 AF XY: 0.000496 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00152 AC: 2221AN: 1461672Hom.: 10 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00148 AC XY: 1078AN XY: 727118 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000617 AC: 94AN: 152290Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000577 AC XY: 43AN XY: 74464 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:3
- -
- -
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26332594, 23396983, 24055113, 24025405, 25637381, 25608792, 23204524, 25351510, 21964171, 19926015, 27538377, 27231019, 27153395, 28404607, 28492532, 25163546, 26899768, 31112425, 30847666) -
Variant summary: The c.3038G>A (p.Arg1013Gln) in RYR2 gene is a missense change that involves the alteration of a mildly conserved nucleotide and 2/4 in silico tools predict benign outcome. The variant falls within one of the four RyR domains, however no functional studies confirming deleterious effect of the variant on the protein function were published at the time of evaluation. The variant was observed in the large and broad cohorts of the ExAC project at an allele frequency of 0.00045 (55/120324 chrs tested), predominantly in individuals of European ancestry (0.00069; 46/66538 chrs tested). This frequency exceeds the maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in this gene (0.0000063). The pathogenicity of the variant was also questioned by recent reports (Olfson, 2015; Paludan-Mller, 2017), where authors indicate that prevalence of the variant in general population is higher than expected for the disorder. The variant was reported in at least one CPVT pt without strong evidence for causality. Lastly, several reputable databases/diagnostic centers classified the variant of interest as VUS. Taking together, based on the prevalence in general population the variant was classified as Benign. -
- -
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Uncertain:2Benign:3
- -
Based on the classification scheme VCGS_Germline_v1.3.5, this variant is classified as Likely benign. Following criteria are met: 0103 - Dominant negative and gain of function are known mechanisms of disease in this gene and are associated with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 (MIM#604772) and left ventricular non-compaction (PMIDs: 12459180, 27646203, 29477366, 31875585, 33500567). Loss of function has been reported for ventricular arrhythmias due to cardiac ryanodine receptor calcium release deficiency syndrome (MIM#115000), however dominant negative mechanism has not been excluded (PMID: 33536282). (I) 0107 - This gene is associated with autosomal dominant disease. (I) 0112 - The condition associated with this gene has incomplete penetrance. Penetrance for CPVT is estimated to be 60-70% (PMID: 23549275). (I) 0200 - Variant is predicted to result in a missense amino acid change from arginine to glutamine. (I) 0251 - This variant is heterozygous. (I) 0309 - Multiple alternative amino acid changes at the same position have been observed in gnomAD (4) (highest allele count: 31 heterozygotes, 0 homozygotes). (I) 0310 - Variant is present in gnomAD >=0.001 and <0.01 for a dominant condition (2295 heterozygotes, 10 homozygotes). (I) 0502 - Missense variant with conflicting in silico predictions and uninformative conservation. (I) 0600 - Variant is located in the annotated RyR domain (DECIPHER). (I) 0710 - Other missense variant(s) comparable to the one identified in this case have inconclusive previous evidence for pathogenicity. p.(Arg1013Leu) has been reported once as a VUS (ClinVar). p.(Arg1013Trp) has been reported seven times as a VUS (ClinVar). (I) 0808 - 0808 - Previous reports of pathogenicity for this variant are conflicting. This variant has been reported twice as benign, four times as likely benign and eight times as a VUS (ClinVar). It has also been reported as a VUS and benign in individuals with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) (PMID:34546463, 38691546), and as VUS and likely benign/benign in patients with conflicting phenotypes (PMID: 38489124, 27231019, 19926015, 21964171). (I) 1208 - Inheritance information for this variant is not currently available in this individual. (I) Legend: (SP) - Supporting pathogenic, (I) - Information, (SB) - Supporting benign -
- -
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are pr eliminary notes: Computational tools suggest impact to protein. MAF 0.07%. Frequ ency too high for gene/disease (RYR2/CPVT). -
- -
Cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
- -
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2 Uncertain:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at