rs149544914
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 0P and 0B.
The NM_001146262.4(SYT14):c.881G>A(p.Gly294Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000485 in 1,614,036 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001146262.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 11Inheritance: AR, Unknown Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYT14 | ENST00000367019.6 | c.881G>A | p.Gly294Asp | missense_variant | Exon 6 of 9 | 1 | NM_001146262.4 | ENSP00000355986.1 | ||
| SYT14 | ENST00000534859.2 | c.647G>A | p.Gly216Asp | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 6 | 1 | ENSP00000442891.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000256 AC: 39AN: 152122Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000219 AC: 55AN: 250946 AF XY: 0.000170 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000509 AC: 744AN: 1461796Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000484 AC XY: 352AN XY: 727188 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000256 AC: 39AN: 152240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000202 AC XY: 15AN XY: 74428 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Available data are insufficient to determine the clinical significance of the variant at this time. The frequency of this variant in the general population is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org) Computational tools predict that this variant is damaging. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at