rs149617956

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 8P and 2B. PP5_Very_StrongBP4BS1_Supporting

The NM_001354604.2(MITF):โ€‹c.1273G>Aโ€‹(p.Glu425Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00278 in 1,614,114 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic,risk factor (โ˜…โ˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: ๐‘“ 0.0016 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes ๐‘“: 0.0029 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

MITF
NM_001354604.2 missense

Scores

8
5
6

Clinical Significance

Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic; risk factor criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts P:23O:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.01
Variant links:
Genes affected
MITF (HGNC:7105): (melanocyte inducing transcription factor) The protein encoded by this gene is a transcription factor that contains both basic helix-loop-helix and leucine zipper structural features. The encoded protein regulates melanocyte development and is responsible for pigment cell-specific transcription of the melanogenesis enzyme genes. Heterozygous mutations in the this gene cause auditory-pigmentary syndromes, such as Waardenburg syndrome type 2 and Tietz syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.

PP5
Variant 3-69964940-G-A is Pathogenic according to our data. Variant chr3-69964940-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_pathogenic, risk_factor]. Clinvar id is 29792.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-69964940-G-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.034677655). . Strength limited to SUPPORTING due to the PP5.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00158 (240/152232) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00244 (166/68008). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00214. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 96 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MITFNM_001354604.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1273G>A p.Glu425Lys missense_variant 10/10 ENST00000352241.9 NP_001341533.1
MITFNM_000248.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.952G>A p.Glu318Lys missense_variant 9/9 ENST00000394351.9 NP_000239.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MITFENST00000352241.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1273G>A p.Glu425Lys missense_variant 10/101 NM_001354604.2 ENSP00000295600 P4O75030-1
MITFENST00000394351.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.952G>A p.Glu318Lys missense_variant 9/91 NM_000248.4 ENSP00000377880 O75030-9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00158
AC:
240
AN:
152114
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000821
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00244
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00136
AC:
342
AN:
251388
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00135
AC XY:
184
AN XY:
135858
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000554
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000491
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00147
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00291
AC:
4251
AN:
1461882
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00273
AC XY:
1983
AN XY:
727244
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000418
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000604
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000765
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000880
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00362
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00215
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00158
AC:
240
AN:
152232
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00129
AC XY:
96
AN XY:
74420
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000818
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00244
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.00231
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00179
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00647
AC:
24
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00493
AC:
19
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00314
AC:
27
ExAC
AF:
0.00133
AC:
161
EpiCase
AF:
0.00278
EpiControl
AF:
0.00261

ClinVar

Significance: Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic; risk factor
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:23Other:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 8 Pathogenic:9Other:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratorio de Genetica e Diagnostico Molecular, Hospital Israelita Albert EinsteinJul 01, 2022ACMG classification criteria: PS3 supporting, PS4 strong, PP1 moderated -
risk factor, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyOMIMNov 13, 2011- -
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterresearchHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, HudsonAlpha Institute for BiotechnologySep 26, 2022PS3_Moderate, PS4, PP1_Moderate, PP3 -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego-This variant is a recurrent alteration that has been reported as a heterozygous change in multiple individuals with cutaneous melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, or both cancers (PMID: 22012259, 22012259, 22080950, 27473757). A large case-controlled study observed that individuals with the p.Glu419Lys variant had a significantly increased risk of cutaneous melanoma (PMID: 22080950). Additionally, several studies showed the p.Glu419Lys variant had moderate co-segregation with melanoma, supporting the theory that this variant is a moderate penetrance melanoma risk factor (PMID: 22080950, 22012259, 23167872). Experimental studies have shown that the p.Glu419Lys variant leads to abnormal transcription of target genes and, in certain cell lines, increased colony forming potential (PMID: 22012259, 22080950, 23787126). It is present in the heterozygous state in the gnomAD population database at a frequency of 0.1% (386/282776). In silico tools used to predict the effect of this variant on protein function yield discordant results. Based on the available evidence, the c.1255G>A (p.Glu419Lys) variant is classified as Pathogenic. -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsMar 30, 2024- -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Immunology and Genetics KaiserslauternFeb 17, 2023ACMG Criteria: PS3, PS4, PP1, PP5; Variant was found in heterozygous state. -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 02, 2024Variant summary: Variant summary: MITF c.952G>A (p.Glu318Lys) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Myc-type, basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0014 in 262840 control chromosomes. This frequency is not higher than the estimated maximum expected for a pathogenic variant in MITF causing Melanoma and Renal Cell Carcinoma Risk (0.0014 vs 0.002), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. The variant c.952G>A has been reported in the literature in multiple individuals affected with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (e.g. Bertolotto_2011, Yokoyama_2012, Ghiorzo_2012, Potjer_2018), where the variant was noted to segregate with the disease in some, but not all families, indicating that the E318K is a possible intermediate risk variant. In a large case-control study authors observed that individuals who carried the variant had significantly higher risk of developing melanoma (OR=2.19 CI: 1.41-3.45). Similarly, the carriers of this variant were reported to have a 5 fold increased risk of developing melanoma, renal cell carcinoma or both these cancers (OR = 5.55 (95% CI 2.59-12.91, Bertolotto_2011). The variant was also observed in individuals with personal and/or family history of breast cancer and other tumor phenotypes (Oliveira_2021), however a meta-analysis found minimal evidence for E318K's contribution to non-melanoma cancer risk (Guhan_2020). Experimental evidence suggests that this missense change causes decreased SUMOylation of MITF, resulting in an increased transcriptional activity with enhanced migration, invasion and colony formation in stable melanoma cells (Bertolotto_2011). In a series of in vitro studies performed by Grill et al, the variant showed normal DNA binding ability, but had promoter specific effects on transcription of its target genes (Grill_2013). Fourteen clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and classified the variant as pathogenic (n=9) / likely pathogenic (n=3) or as a risk factor (n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant appears to be a risk-factor for melanoma and/or renal cell carcinoma with supportive functional evidence. Therefore, it was classified as pathogenic. -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testing;provider interpretationGeisinger Autism and Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health SystemJun 06, 2017This variant was identified in a 12 year old female with moderate intellectual disability, borderline microcephaly, ADHD, speech disorder, stereotypy, constipation, narrow face, upturned nose, and mildly bowed upper lip. It is present in the gnomAD non-Finnish European population at 0.25%. This variant is a well-established risk factor for melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (OR 2.95-8.37, depending on family history) (Bertolotto, 2011; Ghiorzo, 2013; Wadt, 2015; Potrony, 2016). This variant was also present in the proband's mother who had melanoma diagnosed in her early 30s. -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 03, 2018The MITF c.952G>A p.(Glu318Lys) variant, also referred to as c.1255G>A p.(Glu419Lys), is associated with increased risk for melanoma. Bertolotto et al. (2011) identified the p.(Glu318Lys) variant in a heterozygous state in 17 of 603 melanoma patients who were negative for CDKN2A and CDK4 variants. Carriers of this variant exhibited a significant increase in melanoma risk when compared to the control population, with an odds ratio of 4.78 [95% confidence interval: 2.05-11.75). The p.(Glu318Lys) variant was also found to co-segregate with melanoma in three melanoma-prone families. Yokoyama et al. (2011) identified 31 unrelated cases carrying the p.Glu318Lys variant who had at least one first- or second-degree relative diagnosed with melanoma. In 21 of 43 families, the variant was found in all affected individuals who were available for testing. Functional analysis showed that MITF encoded by the p.(Glu318Lys) variant allele had impaired sumoylation and differentially regulated several MITF targets. Berwick et al. (2014) assessed the p.(Glu318Lys) variant in 1194 cases and 2430 controls and found a positive association between the variant and the risk of melanoma, which was independent of the classical melanoma risk factors. Several additional studies have also reported a significantly increased melanoma risk in carriers of the variant (Ghiorzo et al. 2013; Potrony et al. 2015) or higher frequency of the variant in cases versus controls (Wadt et al. 2015). This variant has also been associated with an increased risk of renal cell carcinoma (Bertolotto et al. 2011; Ghiorzo et al. 2013; Potrony et al. 2016). The highest frequency of this allele in the Genome Aggregation Database is 0.002456 in the European (non-Finnish) population (version 2.1.1). Based on the available evidence, the c.952G>A p.(Glu318Lys) variant is classified as a pathogenic risk allele for melanoma. -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingSt. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research HospitalJan 03, 2022The MITF c.1255G>A (p.Glu419Lys) missense change has a maximum population frequency of 0.25% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). This variant is known in the literature as NM_000248.4: c.952G>A (p.Glu318Lys). It has been reported in individuals with melanoma (PMID: 22012259, 22080950, 23167872, 23774529, 25803691, 26650189, 27473757), where the variant has been shown to segregate with disease in studies of families with multiple instances of melanoma (PMID: 22012259, 22080950, 23167872). In addition, case-control studies have indicated that individuals with this variant had a significantly increased risk of developing melanoma with an odds ratio of greater than 2 (PMID: 22080950). This variant has also been observed in individuals with a personal and/or family history of renal cell carcinoma (PMID: 22012259, 23167872, 26650189). The in silico tool REVEL is inconclusive about a pathogenic or benign effect of this variant on protein function, but functional studies have shown decreased SUMOlation of MITF leading to elevated transcription of target genes as compared to the wild-type protein (PMID: 22012259, 22080950, 23787126). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as pathogenic. -
not provided Pathogenic:8Other:1
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect, ClinGen-Variant identified in multiple registry participants. Variant interpreted as Likely pathogenic and reported on 01-03-2018 by Lab or GTR ID 505849 an interpreted as Pathogenic and reported on 09-18-2017 by Lab or GTR ID 61756. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 07, 2023The MITF c.952G>A; p.Glu318Lys variant (rs149617956) is reported in the literature in patients affected with renal cell carcinoma and sporadic and familial melanoma (Bertolotto 2011, Yokoyama 2011, Backman 2021, Bonet 2017). This variant is also reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 29792) and is found in African, Latino, and European populations with an overall allele frequency of 0.14% (386/282776 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. In vitro and in vivo functional analyses demonstrate the glutamic acid to lysine amino acid change results in defective SUMOylation of the MITF protein causing defective cellular senescence (Bertolotto 2011, Bonet 2017). Computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.438). Based on available information, this variant is considered to be pathogenic. References: Bertolotto, C et al. A SUMOylation-defective MITF germline mutation predisposes to melanoma and renal carcinoma. Nature 480, 94-98 (2011). PMID: 22012259 Yokoyama S et al. A novel recurrent mutation in MITF predisposes to familial and sporadic melanoma. Nature. 2011;480(7375):99-103. Published 2011 Nov 13. PMID: 22080950 Backman JD et al. Exome sequencing and analysis of 454,787 UK Biobank participants. Nature. 2021;599(7886):628-634. PMID: 34662886 Bonet C et al. Deciphering the Role of Oncogenic MITFE318K in Senescence Delay and Melanoma Progression. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(8). PMID: 28376192 -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 02, 2020Published functional studies demonstrate a damaging effect: impaired sumoylation and differentially regulated expression of several MITF target genes (Bertolotto 2011, Yokoyama 2011, Grill 2013, Bonet 2017); Most case control studies suggest variant is associated with melanoma (OR=2.09-4.78), with an enrichment of the variant in patients with multiple primary melanomas and those with a family history of melanoma (Bertolotto 2011, Yokoyama 2011, Ghiorzo 2013, Gromowski 2014, Wadt 2015, Potrony 2016); Overrepresented among renal cell carcinoma cases (OR=5.19) and in individuals diagnosed with both melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (OR=14.46) (Bertolotto 2011); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23787126, 27473757, 28125078, 28825054, 31034483, 22012259, 22080950, 28376192, 23167872, 24767713, 25803691, 26650189, 23774529, 24406078, 27153395, 27680874, 26800492, 27181379, 26775776, 26999813, 26999650, 27899189, 27720647, 28787086, 28152038, 24660985, 24290354, 23802662, 23046018, 22158021, 2440678, 24352080, 29485552, 29706638, 29506128, 30759220, 31201024, 30414346, 32054529, 31465090, 33240314) -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJul 16, 2021In the published literature, this variant has been reported in multiple individuals with melanoma and/or renal cell carcinoma (PMIDs: 22012259 (2011), 22080950 (2011), 24638154 (2014), 26775776 (2016), 26800492 (2016), 27473757 (2016), 30414346 (2019), and 32054529 (2020)). Also, multiple case-control studies have shown that this variant is associated with an increased risk for melanoma and/or renal cell carcinoma (PMIDs: 22012259 (2011), 22080950 (2011), 23167872 (2013), 25803691 (2015), and 26650189 (2016)). In addition, functional studies have shown that this variant causes MITF protein overactivity (PMIDs: 22012259 (2011), 22080950 (2011), and 23787126 (2013)). Therefore, this variant is predicted to be pathogenic. -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAiLife Diagnostics, AiLife DiagnosticsNov 02, 2021- -
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital TรผbingenOct 23, 2020- -
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicSep 30, 2022PS3_supporting, PS4 -
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2024MITF: PS3, PM1, PP1, PS4:Supporting -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Pathogenic:3
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 23, 2021The p.E318K pathogenic mutation (also known as c.952G>A), located in coding exon 9 of the MITF gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 952. The glutamic acid at codon 318 is replaced by lysine, an amino acid with similar properties. Several case-control studies have identified an approximately 2-fold increased odds ratio for developing melanoma in carriers of MITF p.E318K compared to healthy controls (Ghiorzo P et al. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2013 Mar;26:259-62; Bruno W et al. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2016 Feb;74:325-32; Berwick M et al. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014 May;27:485-8; Potrony M et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Apr;152:405-12; Mangas C et al. Br. J. Dermatol. 2016 Jul;175:1030-1037). This alteration segregates with melanoma in several families in a pattern that is consistent with a moderate penetrance allele, and has been identified in numerous unselected control groups across studies (Bertolotto C et al. Nature. 2011 Dec;480:94-8; Yokoyama S et al. Nature. 2011 Dec;480:99-103; Ghiorzo P et al. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2013 Mar;26:259-62; Mangas C et al.). In addition, this variant has also been identified in numerous individuals in our internal cohort unaffected with RCC or melanoma (Ambry Internal Data). Though some studies have suggested an increase in risk of renal cell carcinoma, current evidence is insufficient to support a clear increase in risk of renal cancer in carriers of p.E318K over that of the general population (Bertolotto C et al; Guhan S et al. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 13;10(1):17051). Functional analysis suggests that this variant prevents appropriate sumoylation, which leads to differential binding and activation of MITF target genes (Yokoyama S et al. Nature. 2011 Dec;480:99-103; Grill C et al. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2013 Nov;22:4357-67). In addition, this variant is shown to affect cellular senescence further promoting melanoma development (Bonet C et al. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2017 08;109). Based on the available evidence, this alteration is classified as a pathogenic mutation. -
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKnight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health and Sciences UniversitySep 17, 2019- -
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthSep 05, 2023This missense variant replaces glutamic acid with lysine at codon 318 of the MITF protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). Functional studies have shown that this variant decreases the SUMOylation of MITF, resulting in altered transcription of target genes and increased colony forming potential (PMID: 22012259, 22080950, 28376192). This variant has been reported in multiple individuals affected with cutaneous melanoma (PMID: 22012259, 22080950, 23774529, 24638154, 24660985, 25943250, 26103950, 26775776, 26800492, 27473757, 30414346), Ewing sarcoma (PMID: 28125078), pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas (PMID: 27680874), or renal cell carcinoma (PMID: 22012259). Multiple case-control studies have shown that this variant is associated with an increased risk of melanoma (PMID: 22012259, 22080950, 25803691, 26650189, 26775776). In addition, this variant is associated with an increased risk of renal cell carcinoma (PMID: 22012259). In a study of more than 30 families, this variant has been shown to have a moderate segregation with melanoma with LOD of 2.7 (PMID: 22080950). This variant is frequently observed in the general population and has been identified in 386/282776 chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). In summary, this variant alters MITF protein function and is associated with an increased risk of melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. Based on the available evidence, this variant is classified as Likely Pathogenic. -
Tietz syndrome;C1860339:Waardenburg syndrome type 2A;C3152204:Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 8 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 318 of the MITF protein (p.Glu318Lys). This variant is present in population databases (rs149617956, gnomAD 0.2%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with autosomal dominant cutaneous melanoma (PMID: 22012259, 22080950, 23167872, 27473757). It has also been observed to segregate with disease in related individuals. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 29792). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt MITF protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects MITF function (PMID: 22012259, 22080950, 23787126). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. -
Tietz syndrome Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 04, 2022- -
Tietz syndrome;C1860339:Waardenburg syndrome type 2A;C3152204:Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 8;C4310625:Coloboma, osteopetrosis, microphthalmia, macrocephaly, albinism, and deafness Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMay 23, 2022- -
not specified Other:1
risk factor, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesNov 25, 2019- -
Waardenburg syndrome type 2A;C3152204:Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 8 Other:1
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network-Variant interpreted as Pathogenic and reported on 10-29-2020 by Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. -
Melanoma Other:1
risk factor, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 04, 2020MITF c.952G>A (p.Glu318Lys variant, also referred to as Glu419Lys) in MITF has been associated with an increased risk of cutaneous melanoma. This variant has been observed in multiple ethnic backgrounds with highest frequencies in individuals of European ancestry (0.25%, Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD); rs149617956) and is present in ClinVar (ID: 29792). Several large studies have reported an odds ratio of 1.7-5.5 for developing melanoma in heterozygous carriers (OR=2.19 [95% CI 1.41-3.45] Yokoyama 2011, OR=5.55 [95% CI 2.59-12.91] Bertolotto 2011, OR=1.7 [95% CI 1.1-2.6] Berwick 2011, OR=3.19 [95% CI 1.34-7.59] Castro-Vega 2016, OR=2.85 [95% CI 1.31-6.18] Ghiorzo 2013, OR=4.5 [95% CI 1.83-11.01] Potrony 2016). In vitro functional evidence suggests that the p.Glu318Lys variant reduces sumoylation of MITF, which in turn increases MITF transcriptional activity (Bertolotto 2011, Grill 2013, Yokoyama 2011). Therefore, this variant is not expected to cause highly penetrant Mendelian disease. In summary, this variant is an established risk factor for cutaneous melanoma. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.61
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.013
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.25
CADD
Pathogenic
29
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.85
.;D;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.94
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.93
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
1.0
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
1.0
.;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.065
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.035
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.018
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.0
.;M;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.68
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.9
N;N;.;N;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.44
Sift
Benign
0.039
D;D;.;D;T;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.081
T;T;.;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.98
D;.;D;.;D;D;D;D;.
Vest4
0.81
MVP
0.76
MPC
1.0
ClinPred
0.049
T
GERP RS
6.2
Varity_R
0.44
gMVP
0.52

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149617956; hg19: chr3-70014091; API