rs149636614

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP2_StrongBP4BS1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The ATM c.1073A>G (p.Asn358Ser) variant has a gnomAD v2.1.1 filtering allele frequency of 0.1523% (African/African-American; exomes) which exceeds the ATM BS1 threshold of 0.05% (BS1). This variant has been observed in a homozygous and compound heterozygous state (presumed) in multiple individuals without biallelic disease (BP2_Strong; GTR Lab IDs: 500031, 61756). In silico protein predictors (ALIGN GVGD: Class C0; REVEL: 0.054; SIFT: tolerated; PolyPhen2: benign) predict that this alteration is not deleterious and in silico splicing predictors (SpliceAI: AL 0.13/DL 0.00/AG 0.00/DG 0.00; MaxEntScan: 0.00% (wild type = 10.82, variant = 10.82)) find that this variant is unlikely to affect splicing (BP4). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the HBOP Variant Curation Expert Panel. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA286708/MONDO:0016419/020

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00072 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000077 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:4B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.17
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BP4
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BS1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
ATMNM_000051.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1073A>G p.Asn358Ser missense_variant 9/63 ENST00000675843.1 NP_000042.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ATMENST00000675843.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1073A>G p.Asn358Ser missense_variant 9/63 NM_000051.4 ENSP00000501606 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000717
AC:
109
AN:
152096
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000197
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000159
AC:
39
AN:
246050
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000128
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
133234
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00208
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000889
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000893
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000335
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000771
AC:
112
AN:
1453586
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000760
AC XY:
55
AN XY:
723290
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00222
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000137
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000162
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000217
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000716
AC:
109
AN:
152208
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000766
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
74432
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00248
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000374
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000869
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00205
AC:
9
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000189
AC:
23
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:13
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)May 25, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMay 01, 2019- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoOct 27, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 19, 2018This variant is denoted ATM c.1073A>G at the cDNA level, p.Asn358Ser (N358S) at the protein level, and results in the change of an Asparagine to a Serine (AAT>AGT). ATM Asn358Ser was reported in an individual with breast cancer, in an individual with a personal history of a Lynch syndrome-related cancer and/or colon polyps, and in an individual undergoing multigene hereditary cancer panel testing (Yurgelun 2015, Mu 2016, Decker 2017). This variant was observed at an allele frequency of 0.23% (55/23,886) in individuals of African ancestry in large population cohorts (Lek 2016). ATM Asn358Ser is not located in a known functional domain. In-silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether ATM Asn358Ser is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 06, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthSep 23, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jan 28, 2021- -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoSep 02, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 08, 2024Variant summary: ATM c.1073A>G (p.Asn358Ser) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00014 in 1605794 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0024 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2.4 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ATM causing Breast Cancer phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. c.1073A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer (e.g. Decker_2017) and Lynch Syndrome (e.g. Yurgelun_2015). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast Cancer. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 27621404, 28779002, 27720647, 30541756, 28652578, 25980754, 31206626). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 127329). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Apr 25, 2024This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGenMar 09, 2022The ATM c.1073A>G (p.Asn358Ser) variant has a gnomAD v2.1.1 filtering allele frequency of 0.1523% (African/African-American; exomes) which exceeds the ATM BS1 threshold of 0.05% (BS1). This variant has been observed in a homozygous and compound heterozygous state (presumed) in multiple individuals without biallelic disease (BP2_Strong; GTR Lab IDs: 500031, 61756). In silico protein predictors (ALIGN GVGD: Class C0; REVEL: 0.054; SIFT: tolerated; PolyPhen2: benign) predict that this alteration is not deleterious and in silico splicing predictors (SpliceAI: AL 0.13/DL 0.00/AG 0.00/DG 0.00; MaxEntScan: 0.00% (wild type = 10.82, variant = 10.82)) find that this variant is unlikely to affect splicing (BP4). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the HBOP Variant Curation Expert Panel. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioOct 03, 2019- -
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
ATM-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMar 21, 2022This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The ATM p.Asn358Ser variant was identified in 1 of 562 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from individuals or families with breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer and was present in 2 of 488 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.004) from healthy individuals (Lovejoy 2018, Rosenstein 2006). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs149636614) as "With Uncertain significance allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics and Integrated Genetics and as uncertain significance by GeneDx, Invitae, University of Chicago and EGL Genetic Diagnostics), LOVD 3.0 (classified as likely benign by VKGL data sharing initiative). The variant was identified in control databases in 60 of 272346 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 55 of 23886 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Other in 1 of 6350 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 3 of 33660 chromosomes (freq: 0.00009), European Non-Finnish in 1 of 125094 chromosomes (freq: 0.000008), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Asn358 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.060
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.55
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Benign
0.29
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.049
.;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.83
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.65
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.60
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.71
T;T;.
M_CAP
Benign
0.020
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0083
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.23
.;N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.30
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.2
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.054
Sift
Benign
0.72
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.41
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
.;B;B
Vest4
0.085, 0.080
MVP
0.66
MPC
0.097
ClinPred
0.018
T
GERP RS
1.0
Varity_R
0.058
gMVP
0.088

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.13
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149636614; hg19: chr11-108119667; API