rs149636614
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP2_StrongBP4BS1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The ATM c.1073A>G (p.Asn358Ser) variant has a gnomAD v2.1.1 filtering allele frequency of 0.1523% (African/African-American; exomes) which exceeds the ATM BS1 threshold of 0.05% (BS1). This variant has been observed in a homozygous and compound heterozygous state (presumed) in multiple individuals without biallelic disease (BP2_Strong; GTR Lab IDs: 500031, 61756). In silico protein predictors (ALIGN GVGD: Class C0; REVEL: 0.054; SIFT: tolerated; PolyPhen2: benign) predict that this alteration is not deleterious and in silico splicing predictors (SpliceAI: AL 0.13/DL 0.00/AG 0.00/DG 0.00; MaxEntScan: 0.00% (wild type = 10.82, variant = 10.82)) find that this variant is unlikely to affect splicing (BP4). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the HBOP Variant Curation Expert Panel. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA286708/MONDO:0016419/020
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000051.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | NM_000051.4 | c.1073A>G | p.Asn358Ser | missense_variant | 9/63 | ENST00000675843.1 | NP_000042.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | ENST00000675843.1 | c.1073A>G | p.Asn358Ser | missense_variant | 9/63 | NM_000051.4 | ENSP00000501606 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000717 AC: 109AN: 152096Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000159 AC: 39AN: 246050Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000128 AC XY: 17AN XY: 133234
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000771 AC: 112AN: 1453586Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000760 AC XY: 55AN XY: 723290
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000716 AC: 109AN: 152208Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000766 AC XY: 57AN XY: 74432
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 25, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 01, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Oct 27, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 19, 2018 | This variant is denoted ATM c.1073A>G at the cDNA level, p.Asn358Ser (N358S) at the protein level, and results in the change of an Asparagine to a Serine (AAT>AGT). ATM Asn358Ser was reported in an individual with breast cancer, in an individual with a personal history of a Lynch syndrome-related cancer and/or colon polyps, and in an individual undergoing multigene hereditary cancer panel testing (Yurgelun 2015, Mu 2016, Decker 2017). This variant was observed at an allele frequency of 0.23% (55/23,886) in individuals of African ancestry in large population cohorts (Lek 2016). ATM Asn358Ser is not located in a known functional domain. In-silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function. Based on currently available evidence, it is unclear whether ATM Asn358Ser is a pathogenic or benign variant. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 06, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Sep 23, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jan 28, 2021 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Sep 02, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 08, 2024 | Variant summary: ATM c.1073A>G (p.Asn358Ser) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00014 in 1605794 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0024 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2.4 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ATM causing Breast Cancer phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. c.1073A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Breast Cancer (e.g. Decker_2017) and Lynch Syndrome (e.g. Yurgelun_2015). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast Cancer. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 27621404, 28779002, 27720647, 30541756, 28652578, 25980754, 31206626). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 127329). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 25, 2024 | This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGen | Mar 09, 2022 | The ATM c.1073A>G (p.Asn358Ser) variant has a gnomAD v2.1.1 filtering allele frequency of 0.1523% (African/African-American; exomes) which exceeds the ATM BS1 threshold of 0.05% (BS1). This variant has been observed in a homozygous and compound heterozygous state (presumed) in multiple individuals without biallelic disease (BP2_Strong; GTR Lab IDs: 500031, 61756). In silico protein predictors (ALIGN GVGD: Class C0; REVEL: 0.054; SIFT: tolerated; PolyPhen2: benign) predict that this alteration is not deleterious and in silico splicing predictors (SpliceAI: AL 0.13/DL 0.00/AG 0.00/DG 0.00; MaxEntScan: 0.00% (wild type = 10.82, variant = 10.82)) find that this variant is unlikely to affect splicing (BP4). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the HBOP Variant Curation Expert Panel. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Oct 03, 2019 | - - |
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
ATM-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 21, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The ATM p.Asn358Ser variant was identified in 1 of 562 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from individuals or families with breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer and was present in 2 of 488 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.004) from healthy individuals (Lovejoy 2018, Rosenstein 2006). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs149636614) as "With Uncertain significance allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics and Integrated Genetics and as uncertain significance by GeneDx, Invitae, University of Chicago and EGL Genetic Diagnostics), LOVD 3.0 (classified as likely benign by VKGL data sharing initiative). The variant was identified in control databases in 60 of 272346 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 55 of 23886 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Other in 1 of 6350 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 3 of 33660 chromosomes (freq: 0.00009), European Non-Finnish in 1 of 125094 chromosomes (freq: 0.000008), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Asn358 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at