rs149664909

chr10-71777709-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_Moderate BP6 BS1 BS2

The NM_022124.6(CDH23):c.4875G>A(p.Val1625=) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000604 in 1,613,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0030 (2 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00035 (4 hom.)
• Consequence: CDH23 NM_022124.6 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1 B:7
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 4.86

Genes affected

CDH23 (HGNC:13733): (cadherin related 23) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily, whose genes encode calcium dependent cell-cell adhesion glycoproteins. The encoded protein is thought to be involved in stereocilia organization and hair bundle formation. The gene is located in a region containing the human deafness loci DFNB12 and USH1D. Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of this cadherin-like gene. Upregulation of this gene may also be associated with breast cancer. Alternative splice variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.38).
• BP6: Variant 10-71777709-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-71777709-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 178304.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=2, Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr10-71777709-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00304 (462/152216) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0105 (436/41520). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00969. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 231 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 2 AD,AR,Digenic gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
CDH23	NM_022124.6	c.4875G>A	p.Val1625=	synonymous_variant	39/70	ENST00000224721.12

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
CDH23	ENST00000224721.12	c.4875G>A	p.Val1625=	synonymous_variant	39/70	5	NM_022124.6	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00304 AC: 462 AN: 152098 Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0105

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00105

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000441

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00287

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000804 AC: 198 AN: 246402 Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000597 AC XY: 80 AN XY: 133916

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0103

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000699

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000108

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000996

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000350 AC: 512 AN: 1460810 Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000334 AC XY: 243 AN XY: 726620

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0112

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000852

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000540

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000613

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00304 AC: 462 AN: 152216 Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00310 AC XY: 231 AN XY: 74412

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0105

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00105

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000208

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00284

Alfa AF: 0.00169 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00346

Asia WGS AF: 0.000289 AC: 1 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.000164

EpiControl AF: 0.0000594

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3

Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	Apr 30, 2012	Val1625Val in Exon 39 of CDH23: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.9% (30/3520) of Af rican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs149664909). -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -

not provided Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Jan 05, 2021	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 30, 2024	- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1

Benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

Natera, Inc.

Dec 17, 2019

- -

Usher syndrome type 1D Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.38
Cadd	Benign	12
Dann	Benign	0.75

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.090		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149664909; hg19: chr10-73537466;