rs149711133

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_022367.4(SEMA4A):​c.84G>A​(p.Thr28Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000343 in 1,604,252 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00062 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00031 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

SEMA4A
NM_022367.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.22

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SEMA4A (HGNC:10729): (semaphorin 4A) This gene encodes a member of the semaphorin family of soluble and transmembrane proteins. Semaphorins are involved in numerous functions, including axon guidance, morphogenesis, carcinogenesis, and immunomodulation. The encoded protein is a single-pass type I membrane protein containing an immunoglobulin-like C2-type domain, a PSI domain and a sema domain. It inhibits axonal extension by providing local signals to specify territories inaccessible for growing axons. It is an activator of T-cell-mediated immunity and suppresses vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated endothelial cell migration and proliferation in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo. Mutations in this gene are associated with retinal degenerative diseases including retinitis pigmentosa type 35 (RP35) and cone-rod dystrophy type 10 (CORD10). Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified.[provided by RefSeq, Sep 2010]
SEMA4A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • cone-rod dystrophy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial colorectal cancer type X
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • retinitis pigmentosa 35
    Inheritance: AR, Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • cone-rod dystrophy 10
    Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Lynch syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.66).
BP6
Variant 1-156154662-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-156154662-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 195371.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.22 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR,Unknown gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_022367.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
SEMA4A
NM_022367.4
MANE Select
c.84G>Ap.Thr28Thr
synonymous
Exon 2 of 15NP_071762.2
SEMA4A
NM_001193300.2
c.84G>Ap.Thr28Thr
synonymous
Exon 3 of 16NP_001180229.1
SEMA4A
NM_001193301.2
c.84G>Ap.Thr28Thr
synonymous
Exon 2 of 15NP_001180230.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
SEMA4A
ENST00000368285.8
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.84G>Ap.Thr28Thr
synonymous
Exon 2 of 15ENSP00000357268.3
SEMA4A
ENST00000355014.6
TSL:1
c.84G>Ap.Thr28Thr
synonymous
Exon 2 of 15ENSP00000347117.2
SEMA4A
ENST00000368282.1
TSL:1
c.84G>Ap.Thr28Thr
synonymous
Exon 1 of 14ENSP00000357265.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000624
AC:
95
AN:
152248
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00392
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000515
AC:
117
AN:
227380
AF XY:
0.000382
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000722
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00214
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000586
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000342
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00213
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000313
AC:
455
AN:
1451886
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000297
AC XY:
214
AN XY:
721226
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000120
AC:
4
AN:
33438
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00246
AC:
105
AN:
42764
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25848
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000253
AC:
1
AN:
39458
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000119
AC:
1
AN:
84376
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52236
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5758
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000292
AC:
324
AN:
1107938
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000333
AC:
20
AN:
60070
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.483
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
26
52
78
104
130
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000623
AC:
95
AN:
152366
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000644
AC XY:
48
AN XY:
74506
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000144
AC:
6
AN:
41586
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00392
AC:
60
AN:
15310
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000397
AC:
27
AN:
68038
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000945
AC:
2
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
13
17
21
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000232
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000642
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 04, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Retinitis Pigmentosa, Recessive Uncertain:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cone-rod dystrophy 10 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

not specified Benign:1
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.66
CADD
Benign
1.7
DANN
Benign
0.93
PhyloP100
-1.2
PromoterAI
-0.010
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149711133; hg19: chr1-156124453; API