Menu
GeneBe

rs149764887

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_004655.4(AXIN2):c.1685C>T(p.Pro562Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000471 in 1,614,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P562S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00030 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00049 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

AXIN2
NM_004655.4 missense

Scores

1
15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.376
Variant links:
Genes affected
AXIN2 (HGNC:904): (axin 2) The Axin-related protein, Axin2, presumably plays an important role in the regulation of the stability of beta-catenin in the Wnt signaling pathway, like its rodent homologs, mouse conductin/rat axil. In mouse, conductin organizes a multiprotein complex of APC (adenomatous polyposis of the colon), beta-catenin, glycogen synthase kinase 3-beta, and conductin, which leads to the degradation of beta-catenin. Apparently, the deregulation of beta-catenin is an important event in the genesis of a number of malignancies. The AXIN2 gene has been mapped to 17q23-q24, a region that shows frequent loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer, neuroblastoma, and other tumors. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer with defective mismatch repair. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.013717681).
BP6
Variant 17-65537351-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-65537351-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127937.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Uncertain_significance=3, Benign=2}. Variant chr17-65537351-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 47 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
AXIN2NM_004655.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1685C>T p.Pro562Leu missense_variant 6/11 ENST00000307078.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
AXIN2ENST00000307078.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1685C>T p.Pro562Leu missense_variant 6/111 NM_004655.4 P1
AXIN2ENST00000375702.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1685C>T p.Pro562Leu missense_variant 5/91
AXIN2ENST00000618960.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1685C>T p.Pro562Leu missense_variant 6/105

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000309
AC:
47
AN:
152140
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000603
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000336
AC:
84
AN:
249918
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000340
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
135226
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000173
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000642
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000489
AC:
715
AN:
1461864
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.000514
AC XY:
374
AN XY:
727230
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000201
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000348
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000615
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000199
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000302
AC:
46
AN:
152258
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000255
AC XY:
19
AN XY:
74434
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000481
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000531
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000378
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000581
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
0.000305
AC:
37
EpiCase
AF:
0.000654
EpiControl
AF:
0.000948

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:6
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 19, 2021In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with primary melanoma but also in healthy controls (Pedace 2011); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21294210, 26224873, 27739435, 28717660) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMar 01, 2023AXIN2: BP4 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoMar 09, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Oligodontia-cancer predisposition syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 30, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsJan 17, 2019This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 02, 2022Variant summary: AXIN2 c.1685C>T (p.Pro562Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00034 in 249918 control chromosomes (gnomAD), predominantly at a frequency of 0.00064 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 4.5 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in AXIN2 causing Colorectal Cancer phenotype (0.00014), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.1685C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals of Non-Finnish European ancestry affected tooth agenesis (Keskin_2021), Colorectal Cancer (Chan_2021), and Breast Cancer (Moradian_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with disease. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: two classified the variant as of uncertain significance, three as likely benign, and one as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Mar 29, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 29, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
AXIN2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJul 03, 2023This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.056
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.53
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.63
Cadd
Benign
0.18
Dann
Benign
0.71
Eigen
Benign
-2.0
Eigen_PC
Benign
-2.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.087
N
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.11
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.014
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.29
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.57
N;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.15
Sift
Benign
0.60
T;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.85
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
.;B;B
Vest4
0.075
MVP
0.085
MPC
0.18
ClinPred
0.026
T
GERP RS
-4.6
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
gMVP
0.16

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149764887; hg19: chr17-63533469; API