rs149775942

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_004064.5(CDKN1B):​c.426G>A​(p.Thr142Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00517 in 1,609,008 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 34 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T142T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0035 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0053 ( 33 hom. )

Consequence

CDKN1B
NM_004064.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.09

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDKN1B (HGNC:1785): (cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1B) This gene encodes a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, which shares a limited similarity with CDK inhibitor CDKN1A/p21. The encoded protein binds to and prevents the activation of cyclin E-CDK2 or cyclin D-CDK4 complexes, and thus controls the cell cycle progression at G1. The degradation of this protein, which is triggered by its CDK dependent phosphorylation and subsequent ubiquitination by SCF complexes, is required for the cellular transition from quiescence to the proliferative state. Mutations in this gene are associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type IV (MEN4). [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]
CDKN1B Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, ClinGen
  • multiple endocrine neoplasia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
  • hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer
    Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 12-12718265-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-12718265-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 239622.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.09 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00351 (535/152358) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00528 (359/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00483. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 229 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 33 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CDKN1BNM_004064.5 linkc.426G>A p.Thr142Thr synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 3 ENST00000228872.9 NP_004055.1 P46527Q6I9V6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDKN1BENST00000228872.9 linkc.426G>A p.Thr142Thr synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 3 1 NM_004064.5 ENSP00000228872.4 P46527

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00351
AC:
534
AN:
152240
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00412
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0138
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000828
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00526
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00382
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00364
AC:
890
AN:
244544
AF XY:
0.00380
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00101
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00229
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0148
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000409
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00536
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00363
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00534
AC:
7782
AN:
1456650
Hom.:
33
Cov.:
39
AF XY:
0.00525
AC XY:
3806
AN XY:
724826
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000926
AC:
31
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00253
AC:
113
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0157
AC:
411
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000672
AC:
58
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000394
AC:
19
AN:
48258
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0125
AC:
72
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00610
AC:
6782
AN:
1111970
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00489
AC:
295
AN:
60364
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
427
854
1282
1709
2136
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
268
536
804
1072
1340
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00351
AC:
535
AN:
152358
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00307
AC XY:
229
AN XY:
74512
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00115
AC:
48
AN:
41594
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00412
AC:
63
AN:
15308
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0138
AC:
48
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000829
AC:
4
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000188
AC:
2
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0102
AC:
3
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00528
AC:
359
AN:
68032
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00378
AC:
8
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
27
55
82
110
137
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00605
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00395
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00502
EpiControl
AF:
0.00480

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 Benign:8
Oct 10, 2014
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 13, 2016
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 15, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 08, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:5
Nov 07, 2016
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 19, 2018
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 06, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Jun 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

CDKN1B: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer Benign:1
Jun 05, 2023
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Jan 06, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
7.7
DANN
Benign
0.95
PhyloP100
2.1
PromoterAI
0.011
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149775942; hg19: chr12-12871199; COSMIC: COSV104563836; API