rs149872184
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_007078.3(LDB3):c.378G>A(p.Ala126Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000101 in 1,609,794 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00010 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
LDB3
NM_007078.3 synonymous
NM_007078.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.975
Genes affected
LDB3 (HGNC:15710): (LIM domain binding 3) This gene encodes a PDZ domain-containing protein. PDZ motifs are modular protein-protein interaction domains consisting of 80-120 amino acid residues. PDZ domain-containing proteins interact with each other in cytoskeletal assembly or with other proteins involved in targeting and clustering of membrane proteins. The protein encoded by this gene interacts with alpha-actinin-2 through its N-terminal PDZ domain and with protein kinase C via its C-terminal LIM domains. The LIM domain is a cysteine-rich motif defined by 50-60 amino acids containing two zinc-binding modules. This protein also interacts with all three members of the myozenin family. Mutations in this gene have been associated with myofibrillar myopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified; all isoforms have N-terminal PDZ domains while only longer isoforms (1, 2 and 5) have C-terminal LIM domains. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 10-86681492-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-86681492-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 464272.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-86681492-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.975 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000104 (151/1457532) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00118 (102/86220). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000997. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 94 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 11 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDB3 | NM_007078.3 | c.378G>A | p.Ala126Ala | synonymous_variant | 5/14 | ENST00000361373.9 | NP_009009.1 | |
LDB3 | NM_001368067.1 | c.321+1335G>A | intron_variant | ENST00000263066.11 | NP_001354996.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDB3 | ENST00000361373.9 | c.378G>A | p.Ala126Ala | synonymous_variant | 5/14 | 1 | NM_007078.3 | ENSP00000355296.3 | ||
ENSG00000289258 | ENST00000443292.2 | c.1887G>A | p.Ala629Ala | synonymous_variant | 15/18 | 1 | ENSP00000393132.2 | |||
LDB3 | ENST00000263066.11 | c.321+1335G>A | intron_variant | 1 | NM_001368067.1 | ENSP00000263066.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152146Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
12
AN:
152146
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000180 AC: 44AN: 244346Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000240 AC XY: 32AN XY: 133128
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
44
AN:
244346
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
32
AN XY:
133128
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000104 AC: 151AN: 1457532Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000130 AC XY: 94AN XY: 725312
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
151
AN:
1457532
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
94
AN XY:
725312
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000722 AC: 11AN: 152262Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000107 AC XY: 8AN XY: 74458
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
152262
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74458
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Myofibrillar myopathy 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Mar 10, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 29, 2021 | - - |
LDB3-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 10, 2024 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 12, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at