Menu
GeneBe

rs149875171

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_004168.4(SDHA):c.1368G>A(p.Ser456=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0018 in 1,614,044 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S456S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0019 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

SDHA
NM_004168.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -6.67
Variant links:
Genes affected
SDHA (HGNC:10680): (succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A) This gene encodes a major catalytic subunit of succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, a complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits and is localized in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a form of mitochondrial respiratory chain deficiency known as Leigh Syndrome. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 3q29. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.97).
BP6
Variant 5-236535-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-236535-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 224948.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr5-236535-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00119 (181/152380) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00203 (138/68044). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00175. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 74 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SDHANM_004168.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1368G>A p.Ser456= synonymous_variant 10/15 ENST00000264932.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SDHAENST00000264932.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.1368G>A p.Ser456= synonymous_variant 10/151 NM_004168.4 P1P31040-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00119
AC:
181
AN:
152262
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000362
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00140
AC:
352
AN:
251172
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00153
AC XY:
208
AN XY:
135742
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000431
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000925
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00167
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000231
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00221
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000978
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00187
AC:
2727
AN:
1461664
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00190
AC XY:
1378
AN XY:
727142
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000209
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000962
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000225
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00218
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00119
AC:
181
AN:
152380
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000993
AC XY:
74
AN XY:
74528
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000361
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.00207
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00130
EpiCase
AF:
0.00251
EpiControl
AF:
0.00308

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 11, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenFeb 01, 2024SDHA: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJul 20, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoDec 03, 2020- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Nov 04, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 10, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Leigh syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Paragangliomas 5;C5700310:Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Paragangliomas 5 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.97
Cadd
Benign
0.063
Dann
Benign
0.70
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.8

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149875171; hg19: chr5-236650; API