rs149887461

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001128178.3(NPHP1):​c.1469G>A​(p.Arg490Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000322 in 1,613,754 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R490S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00044 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00031 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

NPHP1
NM_001128178.3 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.99

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NPHP1 (HGNC:7905): (nephrocystin 1) This gene encodes a protein with src homology domain 3 (SH3) patterns. This protein interacts with Crk-associated substrate, and it appears to function in the control of cell division, as well as in cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion signaling, likely as part of a multifunctional complex localized in actin- and microtubule-based structures. Mutations in this gene cause familial juvenile nephronophthisis type 1, a kidney disorder involving both tubules and glomeruli. Defects in this gene are also associated with Senior-Loken syndrome type 1, also referred to as juvenile nephronophthisis with Leber amaurosis, which is characterized by kidney and eye disease, and with Joubert syndrome type 4, which is characterized by cerebellar ataxia, oculomotor apraxia, psychomotor delay and neonatal breathing abnormalities, sometimes including retinal dystrophy and renal disease. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
NPHP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Joubert syndrome with renal defect
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, G2P
  • nephronophthisis 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Bardet-Biedl syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Senior-Loken syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006969422).
BP6
Variant 2-110143602-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-110143602-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 330730.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00044 (67/152248) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00332 (16/4820). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00208. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 36 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 7 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NPHP1NM_001128178.3 linkc.1469G>A p.Arg490Lys missense_variant Exon 16 of 20 ENST00000445609.7 NP_001121650.1 O15259-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NPHP1ENST00000445609.7 linkc.1469G>A p.Arg490Lys missense_variant Exon 16 of 20 1 NM_001128178.3 ENSP00000389879.3 O15259-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000447
AC:
68
AN:
152130
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00352
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000624
AC:
157
AN:
251414
AF XY:
0.000751
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000405
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000992
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000290
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00130
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000310
AC:
453
AN:
1461506
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000397
AC XY:
289
AN XY:
727090
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000119
AC:
4
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000559
AC:
25
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000880
AC:
23
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39684
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00231
AC:
199
AN:
86248
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53398
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00191
AC:
11
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000140
AC:
156
AN:
1111694
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000580
AC:
35
AN:
60382
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.451
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
26
52
78
104
130
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000440
AC:
67
AN:
152248
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000484
AC XY:
36
AN XY:
74440
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000481
AC:
2
AN:
41550
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00196
AC:
30
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000865
AC:
3
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00332
AC:
16
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10594
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000162
AC:
11
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
4
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.519
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
7
10
14
17
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000350
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.000623
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000618
AC:
75
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000709
EpiControl
AF:
0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Dec 26, 2019
Al Jalila Children’s Genomics Center, Al Jalila Childrens Speciality Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 08, 2018
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 28, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Senior-Loken syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Nephronophthisis 1 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Joubert syndrome with renal defect Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

NPHP1-related disorder Benign:1
Jan 31, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Jan 20, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
Jul 05, 2024
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.092
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.49
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Benign
0.88
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.064
.;.;T;.;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.65
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.37
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.65
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.73
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.011
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0070
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.20
.;.;N;.;.
PhyloP100
2.0
PrimateAI
Benign
0.38
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.59
N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.069
Sift
Benign
0.70
T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.15
B;B;B;B;B
Vest4
0.094
MVP
0.67
MPC
0.20
ClinPred
0.014
T
GERP RS
4.3
Varity_R
0.055
gMVP
0.45
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149887461; hg19: chr2-110901179; API