rs149903666

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_006087.4(TUBB4A):​c.915G>A​(p.Pro305Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00204 in 1,613,872 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0026 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

TUBB4A
NM_006087.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.18

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TUBB4A (HGNC:20774): (tubulin beta 4A class IVa) This gene encodes a member of the beta tubulin family. Beta tubulins are one of two core protein families (alpha and beta tubulins) that heterodimerize and assemble to form microtubules. Mutations in this gene cause hypomyelinating leukodystrophy-6 and autosomal dominant torsion dystonia-4. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. A pseudogene of this gene is found on chromosome X. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]
TUBB4A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hypomyelinating leukodystrophy 6
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Illumina
  • TUBB4A-related neurologic disorder
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
  • torsion dystonia 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 19-6495584-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-6495584-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 212502.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.18 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00259 (394/152320) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00223 (152/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00195. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 247 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 394 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TUBB4ANM_006087.4 linkc.915G>A p.Pro305Pro synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 4 ENST00000264071.7 NP_006078.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TUBB4AENST00000264071.7 linkc.915G>A p.Pro305Pro synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 4 1 NM_006087.4 ENSP00000264071.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00259
AC:
394
AN:
152202
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0206
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00223
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00292
AC:
730
AN:
249720
AF XY:
0.00289
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000522
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000499
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000548
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0218
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00192
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00245
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00198
AC:
2901
AN:
1461552
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00194
AC XY:
1411
AN XY:
727088
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000269
AC:
9
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000582
AC:
26
AN:
44706
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000613
AC:
16
AN:
26106
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39694
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000232
AC:
2
AN:
86236
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0191
AC:
1020
AN:
53348
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000524
AC:
3
AN:
5728
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00156
AC:
1737
AN:
1111882
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00146
AC:
88
AN:
60378
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.474
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
263
526
788
1051
1314
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
60
120
180
240
300
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00259
AC:
394
AN:
152320
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00332
AC XY:
247
AN XY:
74486
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000289
AC:
12
AN:
41574
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000261
AC:
4
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0206
AC:
219
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00223
AC:
152
AN:
68014
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00237
AC:
5
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.490
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
19
37
56
74
93
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00195
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000979
EpiCase
AF:
0.00104
EpiControl
AF:
0.00213

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hypomyelinating leukodystrophy 6 Benign:2
Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Sep 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

TUBB4A: BP4, BP7 -

Aug 17, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Uncertain:1
Feb 18, 2015
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Torsion dystonia 4 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
3.5
DANN
Benign
0.83
PhyloP100
-1.2
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs149903666; hg19: chr19-6495595; API