rs150008398

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 4P and 5B. PM1PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_006397.3(RNASEH2A):c.374T>C(p.Ile125Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000849 in 1,614,198 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000053 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RNASEH2A
NM_006397.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.21

Variant links:

Genes affected

RNASEH2A (HGNC:18518): (ribonuclease H2 subunit A) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the heterotrimeric type II ribonuclease H enzyme (RNAseH2). RNAseH2 is the major source of ribonuclease H activity in mammalian cells and endonucleolytically cleaves ribonucleotides. It is predicted to remove Okazaki fragment RNA primers during lagging strand DNA synthesis and to excise single ribonucleotides from DNA-DNA duplexes. Mutations in this gene cause Aicardi-Goutieres Syndrome (AGS), a an autosomal recessive neurological disorder characterized by progressive microcephaly and psychomotor retardation, intracranial calcifications, elevated levels of interferon-alpha and white blood cells in the cerebrospinal fluid.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]

RNASEH2A links:

THSD8 (HGNC:53785): (thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 8)

THSD8 links:

HOOK2 (HGNC:19885): (hook microtubule tethering protein 2) Hook proteins are cytosolic coiled-coil proteins that contain conserved N-terminal domains, which attach to microtubules, and more divergent C-terminal domains, which mediate binding to organelles. The Drosophila Hook protein is a component of the endocytic compartment.[supplied by OMIM, Apr 2004]

HOOK2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM1

In a domain RNase H type-2 (size 222) in uniprot entity RNH2A_HUMAN there are 12 pathogenic changes around while only 4 benign (75%) in NM_006397.3

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.059687346).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000387 (59/152314) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0012 (50/41576). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000937. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 25 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RNASEH2A	NM_006397.3 link	c.374T>C	p.Ile125Thr	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 8	ENST00000221486.6	NP_006388.2	O75792

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RNASEH2A	ENST00000221486.6 link	c.374T>C	p.Ile125Thr	missense_variant	Exon 4 of 8	1	NM_006397.3	ENSP00000221486.4		O75792

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000375

AC:

AN:

152196

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00116

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000524

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000123

AC:

AN:

251490

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000103

AC XY:

AN XY:

135922

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00154

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000578

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000534

AC:

AN:

1461884

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000509

AC XY:

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00170

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000112

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000348

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000374

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000182

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000387

AC:

AN:

152314

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000336

AC XY:

AN XY:

74486

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00120

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.0000927

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000370

ExAC

AF:

0.000140

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 4

Uncertain:2

Dec 15, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2022

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with threonine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 125 of the RNASEH2A protein (p.Ile125Thr). This variant is present in population databases (rs150008398, gnomAD 0.1%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RNASEH2A-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 582581). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.78

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.18

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.070

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.76

D;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.53

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.42

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.91

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.93

D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.18

MetaRNN

Benign

0.060

T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.54

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.7

M;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.43

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.8

D;.

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.76

Sift

Benign

0.070

T;.

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.040

D;.

Polyphen

0.99

D;.

Vest4

0.60

MVP

0.98

MPC

0.80

ClinPred

0.16

GERP RS

4.7

Varity_R

0.65

gMVP

0.82

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over