rs150077735

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_005236.3(ERCC4):c.2734G>A(p.Gly912Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000658 in 1,611,460 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G912E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000062 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC4
NM_005236.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:2O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.76

Publications

5 publications found

Variant links:

COSMIC-nc: COSV100318636

Genes affected

ERCC4 (HGNC:3436): (ERCC excision repair 4, endonuclease catalytic subunit) The protein encoded by this gene forms a complex with ERCC1 and is involved in the 5' incision made during nucleotide excision repair. This complex is a structure specific DNA repair endonuclease that interacts with EME1. Defects in this gene are a cause of xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group F (XP-F), or xeroderma pigmentosum VI (XP6).[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]

ERCC4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

xeroderma pigmentosum group F
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, ClinGen
Fanconi anemia complementation group Q
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
XFE progeroid syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Fanconi anemia
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
xeroderma pigmentosum
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
xeroderma pigmentosum-Cockayne syndrome complex
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

ERCC4 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011961639).

BP6

Variant 16-13948330-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-13948330-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 134141.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000985 (15/152218) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00291 (15/5150). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00179. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 11 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005236.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	ERCC4	NM_005236.3	MANE Select	c.2734G>A	p.Gly912Arg	missense	Exon 11 of 11	NP_005227.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
ERCC4	ENST00000311895.8	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.2734G>A	p.Gly912Arg	missense	Exon 11 of 11	ENSP00000310520.7
ERCC4	ENST00000682617.1		c.2872G>A	p.Gly958Arg	missense	Exon 12 of 12	ENSP00000507912.1
ERCC4	ENST00000389138.7	TSL:2	n.2011G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 6 of 6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000986

AC:

AN:

152100

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00291

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000214

AC:

AN:

247552

AF XY:

0.000194

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000290

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00284

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000624

AC:

AN:

1459242

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000496

AC XY:

AN XY:

726054

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33476

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44716

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00199

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

50830

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

8.99e-7

AC:

AN:

1111982

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000166

AC:

AN:

60382

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.473

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000985

AC:

AN:

152218

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000148

AC XY:

AN XY:

74430

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41560

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00291

AC:

AN:

5150

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4820

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10600

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

67998

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.488

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000148

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000151

ExAC

AF:

0.000247

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1Other:1

Sep 17, 2019

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance:not provided

Review Status:no classification provided

Collection Method:reference population

not provided

Uncertain:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

The ERCC4 p.Gly912Arg variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs150077735) and ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae). The variant was identified in control databases in 58 of 264586 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0002192 (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1, non-cancer). The variant was observed in the following populations: East Asian in 57 of 19170 chromosomes (freq: 0.002973) and Latino in 1 of 35058 chromosomes (freq: 0.000029), but was not observed in the African, Ashkenazi Jewish, European (Finnish), European (non-Finnish), Other, or South Asian populations. The p.Gly912 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance.

Cockayne syndrome;C0268140:Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F;C3808988:Fanconi anemia complementation group Q

Benign:1

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F

Benign:1

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.11

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.32

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.23

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.18

Eigen

Uncertain

0.37

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.34

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Benign

0.70

M_CAP

Benign

0.038

MetaRNN

Benign

0.012

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.65

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.3

PhyloP100

5.8

PrimateAI

Benign

0.37

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.6

REVEL

Benign

0.17

Sift

Uncertain

0.014

Sift4G

Benign

0.27

Polyphen

0.93

Vest4

0.35

MutPred

0.34

Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0119)

MVP

0.85

MPC

0.23

ClinPred

0.069

GERP RS

6.0

Varity_R

0.30

gMVP

0.42

Mutation Taster

=64/36

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over