rs150096962

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1

The NM_001079.4(ZAP70):c.1656C>T(p.Ile552Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000523 in 1,613,230 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00054 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ZAP70
NM_001079.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.425

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

ZAP70 (HGNC:12858): (zeta chain of T cell receptor associated protein kinase 70) This gene encodes an enzyme belonging to the protein tyrosine kinase family, and it plays a role in T-cell development and lymphocyte activation. This enzyme, which is phosphorylated on tyrosine residues upon T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) stimulation, functions in the initial step of TCR-mediated signal transduction in combination with the Src family kinases, Lck and Fyn. This enzyme is also essential for thymocyte development. Mutations in this gene cause selective T-cell defect, a severe combined immunodeficiency disease characterized by a selective absence of CD8-positive T-cells. Two transcript variants that encode different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ZAP70 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

combined immunodeficiency due to ZAP70 deficiency
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

ZAP70 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).

BP6

Variant 2-97738027-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-97738027-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 471241.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.425 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000375 (57/152142) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00075 (51/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000586. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 22 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ZAP70	NM_001079.4 link	c.1656C>T	p.Ile552Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 14	ENST00000264972.10	NP_001070.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ZAP70	ENST00000264972.10 link	c.1656C>T	p.Ile552Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 14	1	NM_001079.4	ENSP00000264972.5		P43403-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000375

AC:

AN:

152142

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000576

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000750

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000960

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000356

AC:

AN:

249682

AF XY:

0.000355

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000621

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000582

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000697

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000546

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000664

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000539

AC:

787

AN:

1461088

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000543

AC XY:

395

AN XY:

726862

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000896

AC:

AN:

33472

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000897

AC:

AN:

44588

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000383

AC:

AN:

26118

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39686

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000128

AC:

AN:

86200

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53380

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000654

AC:

727

AN:

1111534

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000497

AC:

AN:

60346

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

104

157

209

261

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

110

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000375

AC:

AN:

152142

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000296

AC XY:

AN XY:

74316

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41408

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000654

AC:

AN:

15282

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000576

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5196

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4834

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000750

AC:

AN:

68014

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000960

AC:

AN:

2084

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.498

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000533

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000366

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

ZAP70: BP4, BP7 -

Combined immunodeficiency due to ZAP70 deficiency

Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

ZAP70-Related Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

Benign:1

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.46

CADD

Benign

8.9

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.68

PhyloP100

-0.42

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.080

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over