rs150133983

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_002473.6(MYH9):c.2295C>T(p.Ala765Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000152 in 1,613,852 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MYH9
NM_002473.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.58

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]

MYH9 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).

BP6

Variant 22-36304090-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36304090-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 341521.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.58 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000177 (27/152348) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00404 (21/5192). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00271. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 17 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 27 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYH9	NM_002473.6 link	c.2295C>T	p.Ala765Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 19 of 41	ENST00000216181.11	NP_002464.1	P35579-1A0A024R1N1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYH9	ENST00000216181.11 link	c.2295C>T	p.Ala765Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 19 of 41	1	NM_002473.6	ENSP00000216181.6	P35579-1
MYH9	ENST00000685801.1 link	c.2358C>T	p.Ala786Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 42			ENSP00000510688.1	A0A8I5KWT8
MYH9	ENST00000691109.1 link	n.2590C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 13 of 35
MYH9	ENST00000473022.1 link	n.-65C>T		upstream_gene_variant		2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000177

AC:

AN:

152230

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000482

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00404

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000434

AC:

109

AN:

251318

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000412

AC XY:

AN XY:

135908

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000229

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000149

AC:

218

AN:

1461504

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000142

AC XY:

103

AN XY:

727046

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00416

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000197

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000189

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000232

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000177

AC:

AN:

152348

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000228

AC XY:

AN XY:

74498

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000481

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00404

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000703

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000272

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Jan 21, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 21, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

May 22, 2017

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Ala765Ala in exon 19 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.5% (99/18868) of E ast Asian chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad. broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs150133983). -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17;C5200934:Macrothrombocytopenia and granulocyte inclusions with or without nephritis or sensorineural hearing loss

Benign:1

Dec 09, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

MYH9-related disorder

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.72

CADD

Benign

0.023

DANN

Benign

0.88

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.8

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over