rs150248985

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_198525.3(KIF7):​c.3944C>T​(p.Pro1315Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00137 in 1,613,006 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P1315R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

KIF7
NM_198525.3 missense

Scores

3
15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.85

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
KIF7 (HGNC:30497): (kinesin family member 7) This gene encodes a cilia-associated protein belonging to the kinesin family. This protein plays a role in the sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway through the regulation of GLI transcription factors. It functions as a negative regulator of the SHH pathway by preventing inappropriate activation of GLI2 in the absence of ligand, and as a positive regulator by preventing the processing of GLI3 into its repressor form. Mutations in this gene have been associated with various ciliopathies. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]
TICRR (HGNC:28704): (TOPBP1 interacting checkpoint and replication regulator) Enables chromatin binding activity. Involved in regulation of DNA-dependent DNA replication initiation. Located in cytosol and nucleoplasm. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0071223974).
BP6
Variant 15-89628507-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-89628507-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 195000.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00132 (201/152314) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0015 (102/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00126. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 104 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_198525.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
KIF7
NM_198525.3
MANE Select
c.3944C>Tp.Pro1315Leu
missense
Exon 19 of 19NP_940927.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
KIF7
ENST00000394412.8
TSL:5 MANE Select
c.3944C>Tp.Pro1315Leu
missense
Exon 19 of 19ENSP00000377934.3
TICRR
ENST00000561095.1
TSL:1
n.*97-923G>A
intron
N/AENSP00000453922.1
KIF7
ENST00000696512.1
c.4067C>Tp.Pro1356Leu
missense
Exon 19 of 19ENSP00000512678.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00132
AC:
201
AN:
152196
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00301
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00159
AC:
395
AN:
248418
AF XY:
0.00153
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00139
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00953
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00204
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00152
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00263
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00137
AC:
2005
AN:
1460692
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00142
AC XY:
1034
AN XY:
726656
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000896
AC:
3
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00141
AC:
63
AN:
44712
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0100
AC:
261
AN:
26104
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000591
AC:
51
AN:
86232
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00261
AC:
137
AN:
52414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0132
AC:
76
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00118
AC:
1316
AN:
1111904
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00162
AC:
98
AN:
60382
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.488
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
128
257
385
514
642
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
48
96
144
192
240
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00132
AC:
201
AN:
152314
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00140
AC XY:
104
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000192
AC:
8
AN:
41564
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000653
AC:
10
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0112
AC:
39
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000414
AC:
2
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00301
AC:
32
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0204
AC:
6
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00150
AC:
102
AN:
68014
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000946
AC:
2
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
9
18
28
37
46
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00169
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.00122
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00221
AC:
19
ExAC
AF:
0.00149
AC:
181
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00125
EpiControl
AF:
0.00202

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 18, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

KIF7: BS2

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Acrocallosal syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.

not specified Benign:1
Apr 18, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Jul 22, 2025
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

KIF7-related disorder Benign:1
Mar 21, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.081
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.40
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.37
CADD
Benign
20
DANN
Benign
0.77
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.17
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.18
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.037
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.92
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.76
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.072
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0071
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.86
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.0
M
PhyloP100
2.8
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.50
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.9
N
REVEL
Benign
0.11
Sift
Benign
0.47
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.38
T
Polyphen
0.18
B
Vest4
0.091
MVP
0.48
MPC
0.027
ClinPred
0.034
T
GERP RS
5.3
Varity_R
0.086
gMVP
0.19
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150248985; hg19: chr15-90171738; COSMIC: COSV51538895; COSMIC: COSV51538895; API