rs150271870

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_000159.4(GCDH):c.1299G>A(p.Ala433Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000558 in 1,614,016 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000079 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000053 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GCDH
NM_000159.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.926

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

GCDH (HGNC:4189): (glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family. It catalyzes the oxidative decarboxylation of glutaryl-CoA to crotonyl-CoA and CO(2) in the degradative pathway of L-lysine, L-hydroxylysine, and L-tryptophan metabolism. It uses electron transfer flavoprotein as its electron acceptor. The enzyme exists in the mitochondrial matrix as a homotetramer of 45-kD subunits. Mutations in this gene result in the metabolic disorder glutaric aciduria type 1, which is also known as glutaric acidemia type I. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. A related pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 12. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2013]

GCDH links:

SYCE2 (HGNC:27411): (synaptonemal complex central element protein 2) The protein encoded by this gene is part of the synaptonemal complex formed between homologous chromosomes during meiotic prophase. The encoded protein associates with SYCP1 and SYCE1 and is found only where chromosome cores are synapsed. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2012]

SYCE2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).

BP6

Variant 19-12899523-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-12899523-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 255395.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.926 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GCDH	NM_000159.4 link	c.1299G>A	p.Ala433Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 12 of 12	ENST00000222214.10	NP_000150.1
SYCE2	NM_001105578.2 link	c.613-138C>T		intron_variant	Intron 5 of 5	ENST00000293695.8	NP_001099048.1	Q6PIF2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GCDH	ENST00000222214.10 link	c.1299G>A	p.Ala433Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 12 of 12	1	NM_000159.4	ENSP00000222214.4		Q92947-1
SYCE2	ENST00000293695.8 link	c.613-138C>T		intron_variant	Intron 5 of 5	1	NM_001105578.2	ENSP00000293695.6		Q6PIF2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000789

AC:

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000119

AC:

AN:

251308

AF XY:

0.000155

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000704

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000534

AC:

AN:

1461848

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000770

AC XY:

AN XY:

727234

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000126

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000580

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53410

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000180

AC:

AN:

1111980

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000331

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.467

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000789

AC:

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000673

AC XY:

AN XY:

74330

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41438

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15266

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000192

AC:

AN:

5196

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000147

AC:

AN:

68044

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2090

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.479

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000579

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000756

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Glutaric aciduria, type 1

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Mar 13, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 18, 2021

Pars Genome Lab

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 05, 2016

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

4.2

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.87

PhyloP100

-0.93

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.6

Mutation Taster

=97/3

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over