Menu
GeneBe

rs150278938

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_002496.4(NDUFS8):c.4C>T(p.Arg2Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00269 in 1,612,352 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R2H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0028 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

NDUFS8
NM_002496.4 missense

Scores

5
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.312
Variant links:
Genes affected
NDUFS8 (HGNC:7715): (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase core subunit S8) This gene encodes a subunit of mitochondrial NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase, or Complex I, a multimeric enzyme of the respiratory chain responsible for NADH oxidation, ubiquinone reduction, and the ejection of protons from mitochondria. The encoded protein is involved in the binding of two of the six to eight iron-sulfur clusters of Complex I and, as such, is required in the electron transfer process. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Leigh syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.014999539).
BP6
Variant 11-68032155-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-68032155-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 214836.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=6, Likely_benign=5}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00192 (292/152366) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00322 (219/68036). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00287. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 135 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
NDUFS8NM_002496.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4C>T p.Arg2Cys missense_variant 2/7 ENST00000313468.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
NDUFS8ENST00000313468.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.4C>T p.Arg2Cys missense_variant 2/71 NM_002496.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00192
AC:
292
AN:
152248
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000723
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00122
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00322
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00166
AC:
417
AN:
251298
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00168
AC XY:
228
AN XY:
135822
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00117
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000694
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000435
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000647
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00301
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00277
AC:
4041
AN:
1459986
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00267
AC XY:
1936
AN XY:
726268
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000658
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000894
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000353
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000807
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00339
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00249
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00192
AC:
292
AN:
152366
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00181
AC XY:
135
AN XY:
74508
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000721
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00122
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00322
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.00269
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.00195
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00458
AC:
17
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00259
AC:
10
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000909
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00314
AC:
27
ExAC
AF:
0.00151
AC:
183
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00294
EpiControl
AF:
0.00302

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The NDUFS8 p.Arg2Cys variant was identified in the literature in a case with Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility however this patient had variants in the HMBS and CACNA1S genes that were suspected to be the cause of the phenotype (Sambuughin_2018_PMID:30094188). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs150278938) and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by EGL Genetic Diagnostics, Fulgent Genetics, and GeneDx, and as likely benign by Invitae). The variant was identified in control databases in 481 of 282694 chromosomes (2 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.001701 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 394 of 129024 chromosomes (freq: 0.003054), Other in 9 of 7220 chromosomes (freq: 0.001247), African in 25 of 24970 chromosomes (freq: 0.001001), Latino in 25 of 35436 chromosomes (freq: 0.000706), European (Finnish) in 17 of 25118 chromosomes (freq: 0.000677), East Asian in 8 of 19952 chromosomes (freq: 0.000401) and South Asian in 3 of 30616 chromosomes (freq: 0.000098), but was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. The p.Arg2 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 21, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30094188, 20818383, 26764160) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicJun 27, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Apr 08, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 22, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2023NDUFS8: BS2 -
Leigh syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Mitochondrial complex I deficiency, nuclear type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Mitochondrial complex 1 deficiency, nuclear type 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsNov 14, 2023- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 13, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
NDUFS8-related condition Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesDec 11, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.19
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.092
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.10
Cadd
Benign
22
Dann
Benign
0.91
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.19
T;T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.28
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.29
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.21
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.73
T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.20
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.015
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.028
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
N;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.99
D;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.0
N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.55
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.13
T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.83
P;.;P;.
Vest4
0.38
MVP
0.96
MPC
0.67
ClinPred
0.032
T
GERP RS
1.5
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.10
gMVP
0.53

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150278938; hg19: chr11-67799622; COSMIC: COSV50288755; COSMIC: COSV50288755; API