rs150280879

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_201596.3(CACNB2):ā€‹c.1560T>Cā€‹(p.Pro520=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00178 in 1,613,808 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00095 ( 0 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0019 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

CACNB2
NM_201596.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.146
Variant links:
Genes affected
CACNB2 (HGNC:1402): (calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2) This gene encodes a subunit of a voltage-dependent calcium channel protein that is a member of the voltage-gated calcium channel superfamily. The gene product was originally identified as an antigen target in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, an autoimmune disorder. Mutations in this gene are associated with Brugada syndrome. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).
BP6
Variant 10-18539301-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-18539301-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 136647.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-18539301-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.146 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 145 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CACNB2NM_201596.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1560T>C p.Pro520= synonymous_variant 14/14 ENST00000324631.13
CACNB2NM_201590.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1398T>C p.Pro466= synonymous_variant 13/13 ENST00000377329.10
LOC124902386XR_007062076.1 linkuse as main transcript upstream_gene_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CACNB2ENST00000324631.13 linkuse as main transcriptc.1560T>C p.Pro520= synonymous_variant 14/141 NM_201596.3 Q08289-1
CACNB2ENST00000377329.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1398T>C p.Pro466= synonymous_variant 13/131 NM_201590.3 Q08289-3
ENST00000425669.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.377-2A>G splice_acceptor_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000955
AC:
145
AN:
151842
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000436
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00180
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000480
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000863
AC:
217
AN:
251404
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000773
AC XY:
105
AN XY:
135874
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000492
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000867
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00172
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00187
AC:
2730
AN:
1461848
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00177
AC XY:
1287
AN XY:
727222
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000269
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000671
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00237
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00108
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000954
AC:
145
AN:
151960
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000808
AC XY:
60
AN XY:
74276
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000434
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00180
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000475
Alfa
AF:
0.00151
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00105
EpiCase
AF:
0.00185
EpiControl
AF:
0.00190

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Brugada syndrome 4 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 30, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtMar 31, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJun 25, 2020- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 29, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJan 01, 2023CACNB2: BP4, BP7, BS1 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 23, 2015This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.62
CADD
Benign
8.4
DANN
Benign
0.50

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150280879; hg19: chr10-18828230; API