rs150280879

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_201596.3(CACNB2):c.1560T>C(p.Pro520Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00178 in 1,613,808 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00095 ( 0 hom., cov: 30)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0019 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

CACNB2
NM_201596.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.146

Publications

5 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CACNB2 (HGNC:1402): (calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2) This gene encodes a subunit of a voltage-dependent calcium channel protein that is a member of the voltage-gated calcium channel superfamily. The gene product was originally identified as an antigen target in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, an autoimmune disorder. Mutations in this gene are associated with Brugada syndrome. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2013]

CACNB2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Brugada syndrome 4
Inheritance: AD, Unknown Classification: LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
Brugada syndrome 1
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
short QT syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

CACNB2 links:

ENSG00000240291 (HGNC:58168):

ENSG00000240291 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).

BP6

Variant 10-18539301-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-18539301-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 136647.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.146 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 145 AD,Unknown gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CACNB2	NM_201596.3 link	c.1560T>C	p.Pro520Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 14 of 14	ENST00000324631.13	NP_963890.2	Q08289-1
CACNB2	NM_201590.3 link	c.1398T>C	p.Pro466Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 13	ENST00000377329.10	NP_963884.2	Q08289-3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CACNB2	ENST00000324631.13 link	c.1560T>C	p.Pro520Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 14 of 14	1	NM_201596.3	ENSP00000320025.8		Q08289-1
CACNB2	ENST00000377329.10 link	c.1398T>C	p.Pro466Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 13	1	NM_201590.3	ENSP00000366546.4		Q08289-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000955

AC:

145

AN:

151842

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000436

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000189

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00180

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000480

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000863

AC:

217

AN:

251404

AF XY:

0.000773

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000492

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000867

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000139

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00172

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00114

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00187

AC:

2730

AN:

1461848

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00177

AC XY:

1287

AN XY:

727222

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000269

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000671

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000187

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000520

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00237

AC:

2639

AN:

1111974

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00108

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.511

Heterozygous variant carriers

181

361

542

722

903

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

102

204

306

408

510

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000954

AC:

145

AN:

151960

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000808

AC XY:

AN XY:

74276

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000434

AC:

AN:

41448

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

15250

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5144

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4796

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000189

AC:

AN:

10602

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00180

AC:

122

AN:

67942

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000475

AC:

AN:

2104

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.503

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00129

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00105

EpiCase

AF:

0.00185

EpiControl

AF:

0.00190

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Brugada syndrome 4

Benign:3

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 25, 2020

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 31, 2017

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 29, 2014

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Jan 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

CACNB2: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Mar 23, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.62

CADD

Benign

8.4

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.50

PhyloP100

0.15

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over