rs150293825

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000546.6(TP53):c.1014C>T(p.Phe338Phe) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000226 in 1,613,916 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TP53
NM_000546.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:19

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.53

Variant links:

Genes affected

TP53 (HGNC:11998): (tumor protein p53) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein containing transcriptional activation, DNA binding, and oligomerization domains. The encoded protein responds to diverse cellular stresses to regulate expression of target genes, thereby inducing cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, senescence, DNA repair, or changes in metabolism. Mutations in this gene are associated with a variety of human cancers, including hereditary cancers such as Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Alternative splicing of this gene and the use of alternate promoters result in multiple transcript variants and isoforms. Additional isoforms have also been shown to result from the use of alternate translation initiation codons from identical transcript variants (PMIDs: 12032546, 20937277). [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2016]

TP53 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).

BP6

Variant 17-7670695-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-7670695-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 182952.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-7670695-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.53 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000231 (337/1461798) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.000492 (22/44712). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000333. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 169 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 28 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TP53	NM_000546.6 link	c.1014C>T	p.Phe338Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 11	ENST00000269305.9	NP_000537.3	P04637-1K7PPA8Q53GA5

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TP53	ENST00000269305.9 link	c.1014C>T	p.Phe338Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 11	1	NM_000546.6	ENSP00000269305.4		P04637-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000184

AC:

AN:

152118

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000309

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000263

AC:

AN:

250924

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000280

AC XY:

AN XY:

135642

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000579

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000326

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000231

AC:

337

AN:

1461798

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000232

AC XY:

169

AN XY:

727196

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000492

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000197

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000255

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000215

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000184

AC:

AN:

152118

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000162

AC XY:

AN XY:

74290

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000309

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000328

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000200

EpiCase

AF:

0.000436

EpiControl

AF:

0.000711

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:19

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:5

Jun 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

TP53: BP4, BP7 -

Mar 21, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 17, 2022

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 25, 2016

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The c.1014C>T variant affects a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in no amino acid change. One in-silico tool predicts damaging outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice-tools in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may affect ESE site of SRp55. However, these predictions are not confirmed by experimental studies. This variant is found in 26/117820 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002207, which is about 6 times of the maximal expected frequency of a pathogenic allele (0.0000354), suggesting this variant is benign. In addition, multiple clinical laboratories classified this variant as benign/likely benign. Taken together, this variant was classified as benign. -

May 30, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:5

Apr 20, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Mar 18, 2025

Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BS2_Supporting, BS3_Supporting, BP4, BP7 c.1014C>T, located in exon 10 of the TP53 gene, is predicted to result in no amino acid change, p.(Phe338=)(BP7). The SpliceAI algorithm predicts no significant impact on splicing (BP4). In-vitro calibrated functional assays reported no evidence of LOF (PMID: 30224644) (BS3_Supporting). It has been reported in heterozygosis in 2 healthy individuals from the Flossies database. This variant has been reported in the ClinVar database (7x benign, 11x likely benign) and in LOVD (1x likely benign). Based on currently available information, the variant c.1014C>T should be considered a likely benign variant according to TP53 ClinGen EP specifications 2.2. -

Oct 29, 2015

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 18, 2022

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 16, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Li-Fraumeni syndrome 1

Benign:3

Nov 18, 2019

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Jun 18, 2022

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:3

Jul 09, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Li-Fraumeni syndrome

Benign:2

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Benign:1

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.75

CADD

Benign

3.0

DANN

Benign

0.54

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over