rs150391806
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_017636.4(TRPM4):c.3611C>T(p.Pro1204Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00315 in 1,589,480 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017636.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRPM4 | NM_017636.4 | c.3611C>T | p.Pro1204Leu | missense_variant | 24/25 | ENST00000252826.10 | NP_060106.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRPM4 | ENST00000252826.10 | c.3611C>T | p.Pro1204Leu | missense_variant | 24/25 | 1 | NM_017636.4 | ENSP00000252826.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00310 AC: 471AN: 152122Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00343 AC: 696AN: 202944Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00345 AC XY: 378AN XY: 109486
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00316 AC: 4541AN: 1437242Hom.: 10 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00312 AC XY: 2221AN XY: 712962
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00310 AC: 472AN: 152238Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00331 AC XY: 246AN XY: 74430
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Progressive familial heart block type IB Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Oct 09, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 06, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 17, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2024 | TRPM4: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 11, 2023 | - - |
Conduction disorder of the heart Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | Jun 10, 2019 | - - |
Family history of sudden cardiac death Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego | Feb 15, 2017 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 16, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at