rs150411706

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS2

The NM_001365951.3(KIF1B):​c.1014C>T​(p.Tyr338=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000342 in 1,613,540 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 1 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00036 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

KIF1B
NM_001365951.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.80
Variant links:
Genes affected
KIF1B (HGNC:16636): (kinesin family member 1B) Predicted to enable microtubule binding activity and plus-end-directed microtubule motor activity. Predicted to be involved in chemical synaptic transmission; dense core granule cytoskeletal transport; and vesicle-mediated transport. Predicted to act upstream of or within mitochondrion transport along microtubule. Predicted to be located in cytoplasmic vesicle membrane and neuron projection. Predicted to be part of kinesin complex. Predicted to be active in several cellular components, including axon; dendrite; and microtubule. Implicated in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2A1; carcinoma (multiple); multiple sclerosis; neuroblastoma; and pheochromocytoma. Biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.44).
BP6
Variant 1-10276376-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-10276376-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 476791.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.8 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 27 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
KIF1BNM_001365951.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1014C>T p.Tyr338= synonymous_variant 12/49 ENST00000676179.1 NP_001352880.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
KIF1BENST00000676179.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1014C>T p.Tyr338= synonymous_variant 12/49 NM_001365951.3 ENSP00000502065 P1O60333-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000178
AC:
27
AN:
152108
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000966
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000323
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000108
AC:
27
AN:
251012
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000133
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
135640
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000579
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000359
AC:
525
AN:
1461432
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000369
AC XY:
268
AN XY:
727046
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000120
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000448
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000265
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000178
AC:
27
AN:
152108
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000215
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
74306
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000966
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000323
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000376
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000196
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuroblastoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 29, 2020This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpDec 02, 2023- -
KIF1B-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMar 04, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.44
CADD
Benign
4.2
DANN
Benign
0.55
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.8

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150411706; hg19: chr1-10336434; API