rs150553044
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2_Supporting
The NM_024649.5(BBS1):āc.1719A>Gā(p.Gln573=) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000448 in 1,603,838 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0018 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š: 0.00031 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
BBS1
NM_024649.5 synonymous
NM_024649.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.14
Genes affected
BBS1 (HGNC:966): (Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1) Mutations in this gene have been observed in patients with the major form (type 1) of Bardet-Biedl syndrome. The encoded protein may play a role in eye, limb, cardiac and reproductive system development. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
ZDHHC24 (HGNC:27387): (zinc finger DHHC-type containing 24) Predicted to enable protein-cysteine S-palmitoyltransferase activity. Predicted to be involved in peptidyl-L-cysteine S-palmitoylation and protein targeting to membrane. Predicted to be integral component of membrane. Predicted to be active in Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
Variant 11-66531974-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-66531974-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 305472.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-66531974-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBS1 | NM_024649.5 | c.1719A>G | p.Gln573= | synonymous_variant | 17/17 | ENST00000318312.12 | NP_078925.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBS1 | ENST00000318312.12 | c.1719A>G | p.Gln573= | synonymous_variant | 17/17 | 1 | NM_024649.5 | ENSP00000317469 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00180 AC: 273AN: 152040Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
273
AN:
152040
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000568 AC: 132AN: 232520Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000485 AC XY: 61AN XY: 125758
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
132
AN:
232520
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
61
AN XY:
125758
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000306 AC: 444AN: 1451680Hom.: 2 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.000286 AC XY: 206AN XY: 721386
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
444
AN:
1451680
Hom.:
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
AC XY:
206
AN XY:
721386
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00181 AC: 275AN: 152158Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00184 AC XY: 137AN XY: 74390
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
275
AN:
152158
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
137
AN XY:
74390
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1 Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Oct 22, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Jun 28, 2017 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Mar 31, 2021 | - - |
Bardet-Biedl syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at