rs150569450

Positions:

chr15-40624495-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_144508.5(KNL1):c.4231G>A(p.Gly1411Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000178 in 1,613,620 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00095 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000098 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

KNL1
NM_144508.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.455

Variant links:

Genes affected

KNL1 (HGNC:24054): (kinetochore scaffold 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the multiprotein assembly that is required for creation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments and chromosome segregation. The encoded protein functions as a scaffold for proteins that influence the spindle assembly checkpoint during the eukaryotic cell cycle and it interacts with at least five different kinetochore proteins and two checkpoint kinases. In adults, this gene is predominantly expressed in normal testes, various cancer cell lines and primary tumors from other tissues and is ubiquitously expressed in fetal tissues. This gene was originally identified as a fusion partner with the mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) gene in t(11;15)(q23;q14). Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive primary microcephaly-4 (MCPH4). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. Additional splice variants have been described but their biological validity has not been confirmed. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2013]

KNL1 links:

KNL1 (HGNC:):

KNL1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008064032).

BP6

Variant 15-40624495-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-40624495-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 434582.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000946 (144/152216) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00332 (138/41534). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00287. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 68 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
KNL1	NM_144508.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.4231G>A	p.Gly1411Arg	missense_variant	10/26	ENST00000399668.7	NP_653091.3	Q8NG31-2
KNL1	NM_170589.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.4309G>A	p.Gly1437Arg	missense_variant	11/27		NP_733468.3	Q8NG31-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
KNL1	ENST00000399668.7 linkuse as main transcript	c.4231G>A	p.Gly1411Arg	missense_variant	10/26	1	NM_144508.5	ENSP00000382576.3		Q8NG31-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000927

AC:

141

AN:

152098

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00326

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000958

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000237

AC:

AN:

248894

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000155

AC XY:

AN XY:

135080

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00362

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000290

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000885

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000166

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000979

AC:

143

AN:

1461404

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000922

AC XY:

AN XY:

726988

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00368

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000895

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000270

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000215

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000946

AC:

144

AN:

152216

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000914

AC XY:

AN XY:

74434

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00332

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000948

Alfa

AF:

0.0000925

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00107

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00435

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000348

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Jan 31, 2017

- -

Microcephaly 4, primary, autosomal recessive

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Dec 31, 2019

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.13

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.50

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.50

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.22

T;T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.52

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.50

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.15

LIST_S2

Benign

0.65

T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.0051

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0081

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.99

PrimateAI

Benign

0.37

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.1

D;.;D

REVEL

Benign

0.052

Sift

Uncertain

0.018

D;.;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.0040

D;D;D

Polyphen

0.020

B;.;B

Vest4

0.23

MutPred

0.38

Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.013);.;.;

MVP

0.31

MPC

0.051

ClinPred

0.028

GERP RS

2.4

Varity_R

0.088

gMVP

0.14

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over