rs150612172

Positions:

• chr2-178634562-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_Moderate BP6_Very_Strong BS1 BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.42219C>T​(p.Phe14073Phe) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00143 in 1,613,262 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0070 (13 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00085 (10 hom.)
• Consequence: TTN NM_001267550.2 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 3.79

Genes affected

TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]

TTN-AS1 (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.3).
• BP6: Variant 2-178634562-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178634562-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 46954.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-178634562-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-178634562-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00701 (1066/152106) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0241 (1002/41510). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0229. There are 13 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 502 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 13 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TTN	NM_001267550.2	c.42219C>T	p.Phe14073Phe	synonymous_variant	230/363	ENST00000589042.5	NP_001254479.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TTN	ENST00000589042.5	c.42219C>T	p.Phe14073Phe	synonymous_variant	230/363	5	NM_001267550.2	ENSP00000467141.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00700 AC: 1064 AN: 151988 Hom.: 13 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0242

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00210

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.000288

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000279

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00574

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00195 AC: 485 AN: 248248 Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00138 AC XY: 186 AN XY: 134660

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0266

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00128

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.000299

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000160

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00133

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000852 AC: 1245 AN: 1461156 Hom.: 10 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000747 AC XY: 543 AN XY: 726874

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0271

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00154

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.000115

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000464

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000154

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00144

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00701 AC: 1066 AN: 152106 Hom.: 13 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00675 AC XY: 502 AN XY: 74322

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0241

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00209

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.000288

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000279

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00568

Alfa AF: 0.00352 Hom.: 4

Bravo AF: 0.00810

Asia WGS AF: 0.00115 AC: 4 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.0000545

EpiControl AF: 0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:20

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Feb 26, 2014	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Apr 12, 2020	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	Jul 10, 2012	Phe11505Phe in Exon 179 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 2.8% (86/3114) of Afr ican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs150612172). -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	May 13, 2021	- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Sep 10, 2021	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Sep 10, 2021	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Sep 10, 2021	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Sep 10, 2021	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 31, 2024

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Aug 21, 2017

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Sep 13, 2013

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.30
CADD	Benign	5.3
DANN	Benign	0.80

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150612172; hg19: chr2-179499289; COSMIC: COSV60211666; COSMIC: COSV60211666;