rs150613209

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1

The NM_001005361.3(DNM2):c.958G>A(p.Asp320Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000638 in 1,614,034 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D320E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000045 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DNM2
NM_001005361.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 10.0

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNM2 (HGNC:2974): (dynamin 2) Dynamins represent one of the subfamilies of GTP-binding proteins. These proteins share considerable sequence similarity over the N-terminal portion of the molecule, which contains the GTPase domain. Dynamins are associated with microtubules. They have been implicated in cell processes such as endocytosis and cell motility, and in alterations of the membrane that accompany certain activities such as bone resorption by osteoclasts. Dynamins bind many proteins that bind actin and other cytoskeletal proteins. Dynamins can also self-assemble, a process that stimulates GTPase activity. Five alternatively spliced transcripts encoding different proteins have been described. Additional alternatively spliced transcripts may exist, but their full-length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]

DNM2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal dominant centronuclear myopathy
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate B
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
autosomal dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2M
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
fetal akinesia-cerebral and retinal hemorrhage syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
hereditary spastic paraplegia
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

DNM2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.14517361).

BP6

Variant 19-10786672-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-10786672-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 158529.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.0000451 (66/1461868) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00105 (35/33480). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000772. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 25 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNM2	NM_001005361.3 link	c.958G>A	p.Asp320Asn	missense_variant	Exon 7 of 21	ENST00000389253.9	NP_001005361.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DNM2	ENST00000389253.9 link	c.958G>A	p.Asp320Asn	missense_variant	Exon 7 of 21	5	NM_001005361.3	ENSP00000373905.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000243

AC:

AN:

152048

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000701

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000393

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000960

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000111

AC:

AN:

251208

AF XY:

0.000103

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000862

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000578

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000881

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000451

AC:

AN:

1461868

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000344

AC XY:

AN XY:

727238

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00105

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000894

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000101

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000174

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53414

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000360

AC:

AN:

1112002

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000662

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.480

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000243

AC:

AN:

152166

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000242

AC XY:

AN XY:

74398

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000699

AC:

AN:

41504

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000392

AC:

AN:

15296

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5178

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10594

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

67994

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000950

AC:

AN:

2106

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.510

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000451

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000295

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000227

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000115

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2

Jan 18, 2024

Revvity Omics, Revvity

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2017

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.Asp320Asn variant (rs150613209) has not been reported in the medical literature, nor has it been previously identified in our laboratory; however, it is listed in the ClinVar database (Variation ID: 158529). This variant is listed in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) browser with an overall frequency of 0.01% (identified in 33 out of 276,996 chromosomes). The aspartic acid at codon 320 is moderately conserved considering 14 species (Alamut software v2.9), and computational analyses return mixed results regarding the effect of this variant on DNM2 protein structure/function (SIFT: tolerated, PolyPhen2: benign, and Mutation Taster: disease causing). Therefore, based on the available information, the clinical significance of the p.Asp320Asn variant cannot be determined with certainty. -

not specified

Benign:2

Jan 16, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Feb 08, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate B

Benign:2

Nov 29, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal dominant centronuclear myopathy

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Oct 26, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.31

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.34

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.35

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.72

.;.;.;D;.;D

Eigen

Uncertain

0.32

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.43

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.96

D;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.079

MetaRNN

Benign

0.15

T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.24

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.9

L;L;L;L;L;.

PhyloP100

PrimateAI

Pathogenic

0.85

PROVEAN

Benign

-2.2

.;N;N;N;N;.

REVEL

Benign

0.27

Sift

Benign

0.30

.;T;T;T;T;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.25

T;T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0090, 0.010

.;B;.;B;.;.

Vest4

0.81

MVP

0.86

MPC

1.2

ClinPred

0.065

GERP RS

5.0

Varity_R

0.26

gMVP

0.46

Mutation Taster

=43/57

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over