rs150636017

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_000081.4(LYST):c.3083C>G(p.Ser1028Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000889 in 1,613,822 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00049 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00093 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

LYST
NM_000081.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:9B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.750

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

LYST (HGNC:1968): (lysosomal trafficking regulator) This gene encodes a protein that regulates intracellular protein trafficking in endosomes, and may be involved in pigmentation. Mutations in this gene are associated with Chediak-Higashi syndrome, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, though the full-length nature of some of these variants has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2013]

LYST Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Chediak-Higashi syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp
attenuated Chédiak-Higashi syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

LYST links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.022809416).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000493 (75/152240) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00097 (66/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000782. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 34 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000081.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	LYST	NM_000081.4	MANE Select	c.3083C>G	p.Ser1028Cys	missense	Exon 6 of 53	NP_000072.2	Q99698-1
	LYST	NM_001301365.1		c.3083C>G	p.Ser1028Cys	missense	Exon 6 of 53	NP_001288294.1	Q99698-1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
LYST	ENST00000389793.7	TSL:5 MANE Select	c.3083C>G	p.Ser1028Cys	missense	Exon 6 of 53	ENSP00000374443.2	Q99698-1
LYST	ENST00000465349.5	TSL:1	n.3634C>G		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 6 of 12
LYST	ENST00000489585.5	TSL:1	n.3083C>G		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 6 of 23	ENSP00000513166.1	Q99698-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000493

AC:

AN:

152122

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000966

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000377

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000970

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000462

AC:

116

AN:

251048

AF XY:

0.000442

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000124

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000174

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000232

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000881

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000490

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000930

AC:

1359

AN:

1461582

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000916

AC XY:

666

AN XY:

727118

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000597

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000179

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0000383

AC:

AN:

26132

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39688

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86250

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000169

AC:

AN:

53278

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00116

AC:

1286

AN:

1111882

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000878

AC:

AN:

60384

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.467

Heterozygous variant carriers

143

214

286

357

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

112

168

224

280

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000493

AC:

AN:

152240

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000457

AC XY:

AN XY:

74426

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000963

AC:

AN:

41538

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000654

AC:

AN:

15296

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4820

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000377

AC:

AN:

10598

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000970

AC:

AN:

68014

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.530

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000738

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000495

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00108

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00182

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000454

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000465

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000486

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.00131

EpiControl

AF:

0.00113

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Revision:criteria provided, conflicting classifications

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

Chédiak-Higashi syndrome (4)

not provided (2)

Autoinflammatory syndrome (1)

Inborn genetic diseases (1)

LYST-related disorder (1)

not specified (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.073

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.53

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.55

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.85

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.14

Eigen

Benign

-0.62

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.60

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.40

LIST_S2

Benign

0.61

M_CAP

Benign

0.010

MetaRNN

Benign

0.023

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.94

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.92

PhyloP100

0.75

PrimateAI

Benign

0.25

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.3

REVEL

Benign

0.059

Sift

Benign

0.10

Sift4G

Benign

0.092

Polyphen

0.0020

Vest4

0.13

MVP

0.34

MPC

0.075

ClinPred

0.0082

GERP RS

1.8

Varity_R

0.080

gMVP

0.20

Mutation Taster

=78/22

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over