rs150638770

chr2-174753626-G-Achr2-174753626-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_Moderate BP6 BS1

The NM_000079.4(CHRNA1):c.655C>T(p.Leu219=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0031 in 1,614,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L219L) has been classified as Likely benign.

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0021 (1 hom., cov: 31)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0032 (6 hom.)
• Consequence: CHRNA1 NM_000079.4 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1 B:6
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 8.09

Genes affected

CHRNA1 (HGNC:1955): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 1 subunit) The muscle acetylcholine receptor consiststs of 5 subunits of 4 different types: 2 alpha subunits and 1 each of the beta, gamma, and delta subunits. This gene encodes an alpha subunit that plays a role in acetlycholine binding/channel gating. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2012]

(HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
• BP6: Variant 2-174753626-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-174753626-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 198039.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=1, Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1}.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00208 (317/152254) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00344 (234/68024). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00308. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 136 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
CHRNA1	NM_000079.4	c.655C>T	p.Leu219=	synonymous_variant	6/9	ENST00000348749.9
CHRNA1	NM_001039523.3	c.730C>T	p.Leu244=	synonymous_variant	7/10
CHRNA1	XM_017003256.2	c.751C>T	p.Leu251=	synonymous_variant	6/9
CHRNA1	XM_017003257.2	c.676C>T	p.Leu226=	synonymous_variant	5/8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
CHRNA1	ENST00000348749.9	c.655C>T	p.Leu219=	synonymous_variant	6/9	1	NM_000079.4	P1
	ENST00000442996.1	n.322-19123G>A		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant		1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00208 AC: 317 AN: 152136 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000507

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00216

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00245

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00344

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00144

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00245 AC: 615 AN: 251472 Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00248 AC XY: 337 AN XY: 135916

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000738

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000723

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00393

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00416

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00326

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00321 AC: 4693 AN: 1461894 Hom.: 6 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00315 AC XY: 2291 AN XY: 727248

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000418

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000648

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.0000383

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00416

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00382

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00290

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00208 AC: 317 AN: 152254 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00183 AC XY: 136 AN XY: 74436

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000505

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00216

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00245

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00344

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00142

Alfa AF: 0.00323 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00212

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Dec 17, 2014	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Jun 01, 2023	CHRNA1: BP4, BS2 -

not specified Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Mar 24, 2017	- -

Lethal multiple pterygium syndrome Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 31, 2024	- -

Congenital myasthenic syndrome Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.42
Cadd	Benign	8.3
Dann	Benign	0.91

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150638770; hg19: chr2-175618354;