rs150646039

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_006642.5(SDCCAG8):c.1501G>C(p.Asp501His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000229 in 1,614,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. D501D) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SDCCAG8
NM_006642.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.79

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SDCCAG8 (HGNC:10671): (SHH signaling and ciliogenesis regulator SDCCAG8) This gene encodes a centrosome associated protein. This protein may be involved in organizing the centrosome during interphase and mitosis. Mutations in this gene are associated with retinal-renal ciliopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2010]

SDCCAG8 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Senior-Loken syndrome 7
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 16
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
Bardet-Biedl syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Senior-Loken syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

SDCCAG8 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0074546337).

BP6

Variant 1-243378748-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-243378748-G-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 212138.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00125 (191/152262) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00453 (188/41538). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.004. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 85 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SDCCAG8	NM_006642.5 link	c.1501G>C	p.Asp501His	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 18	ENST00000366541.8	NP_006633.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SDCCAG8	ENST00000366541.8 link	c.1501G>C	p.Asp501His	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 18	1	NM_006642.5	ENSP00000355499.3	Q86SQ7-1
SDCCAG8	ENST00000435549.1 link	c.841G>C	p.Asp281His	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 11	1		ENSP00000410200.1	A0A0C4DG71
SDCCAG8	ENST00000493334.1 link	n.468G>C		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 4 of 5	5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00125

AC:

190

AN:

152144

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00452

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000299

AC:

AN:

251134

AF XY:

0.000228

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00412

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000122

AC:

179

AN:

1461776

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000109

AC XY:

AN XY:

727180

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00376

AC:

126

AN:

33468

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000224

AC:

AN:

44694

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26132

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53416

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000694

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000144

AC:

AN:

1111956

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000381

AC:

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.472

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00125

AC:

191

AN:

152262

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00114

AC XY:

AN XY:

74454

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00453

AC:

188

AN:

41538

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15292

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10612

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.504

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000203

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00155

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00454

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000379

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1

May 21, 2015

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1

May 26, 2023

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27491411) -

SDCCAG8-related disorder

Benign:1

Jan 02, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Senior-Loken syndrome 7;C3889474:Bardet-Biedl syndrome 16

Benign:1

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.093

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.57

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.58

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.96

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.015

T;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.44

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.21

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.91

LIST_S2

Benign

0.24

.;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.0067

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0075

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.0

N;.

PhyloP100

2.8

PrimateAI

Benign

0.27

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.0

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.058

Sift

Benign

0.077

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.095

T;T

Polyphen

0.037

B;.

Vest4

0.20

MVP

0.32

MPC

0.10

ClinPred

0.0062

GERP RS

4.6

Varity_R

0.042

gMVP

0.13

Mutation Taster

=97/3

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over