rs150662822
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001105206.3(LAMA4):āc.85G>Cā(p.Asp29His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000461 in 1,609,348 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D29Y) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001105206.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMA4 | NM_001105206.3 | c.85G>C | p.Asp29His | missense_variant | 2/39 | ENST00000230538.12 | NP_001098676.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMA4 | ENST00000230538.12 | c.85G>C | p.Asp29His | missense_variant | 2/39 | 1 | NM_001105206.3 | ENSP00000230538.7 | ||
ENSG00000281613 | ENST00000587816.2 | c.-398+17150C>G | intron_variant | 5 | ENSP00000487146.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000243 AC: 37AN: 152214Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000900 AC: 213AN: 236722Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00131 AC XY: 169AN XY: 129024
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000484 AC: 705AN: 1457016Hom.: 17 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000743 AC XY: 538AN XY: 724412
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000243 AC: 37AN: 152332Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000322 AC XY: 24AN XY: 74492
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 23, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1JJ Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Sep 13, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 04, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 05, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at