rs150682895
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_006892.4(DNMT3B):c.1150G>A(p.Ala384Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0105 in 1,614,144 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 115 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006892.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNMT3B | NM_006892.4 | c.1150G>A | p.Ala384Thr | missense_variant | 11/23 | ENST00000328111.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNMT3B | ENST00000328111.6 | c.1150G>A | p.Ala384Thr | missense_variant | 11/23 | 1 | NM_006892.4 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00953 AC: 1450AN: 152160Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00903 AC: 2271AN: 251404Hom.: 17 AF XY: 0.00926 AC XY: 1258AN XY: 135876
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0106 AC: 15503AN: 1461866Hom.: 109 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0105 AC XY: 7665AN XY: 727234
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00952 AC: 1449AN: 152278Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0109 AC XY: 809AN XY: 74472
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Immunodeficiency-centromeric instability-facial anomalies syndrome 1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Oct 09, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 23, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2024 | DNMT3B: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Centromeric instability of chromosomes 1,9 and 16 and immunodeficiency Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at