rs150712346
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_144997.7(FLCN):c.246C>T(p.Cys82Cys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000468 in 1,614,066 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00049 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
FLCN
NM_144997.7 synonymous
NM_144997.7 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.699
Genes affected
FLCN (HGNC:27310): (folliculin) This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Mutations in this gene are associated with Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome, which is characterized by fibrofolliculomas, renal tumors, lung cysts, and pneumothorax. Alternative splicing of this gene results in two transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).
BP6
Variant 17-17227892-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-17227892-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 184250.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=1}. Variant chr17-17227892-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.699 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000493 (721/1461792) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000588 (654/1112002). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00055. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 330 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 34 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCN | NM_144997.7 | c.246C>T | p.Cys82Cys | synonymous_variant | 4/14 | ENST00000285071.9 | NP_659434.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCN | ENST00000285071.9 | c.246C>T | p.Cys82Cys | synonymous_variant | 4/14 | 1 | NM_144997.7 | ENSP00000285071.4 | ||
ENSG00000264187 | ENST00000427497.3 | n.148+98C>T | intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000394249.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000223 AC: 34AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
34
AN:
152156
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000199 AC: 50AN: 250846Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000236 AC XY: 32AN XY: 135680
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
50
AN:
250846
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
32
AN XY:
135680
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000493 AC: 721AN: 1461792Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000454 AC XY: 330AN XY: 727188
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
721
AN:
1461792
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
330
AN XY:
727188
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000223 AC: 34AN: 152274Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 16AN XY: 74470
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
34
AN:
152274
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
74470
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | FLCN: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 08, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 16, 2017 | The c.246C>T; p.Cys82Cys variant (rs150712346) does not alter the amino acid sequence of the FLCN protein and computational splice site prediction algorithms do not predict a change in the nearest splice site or creation of a cryptic splice site (Alamut v2.9.0). This variant has not been reported in association with any hereditary cancer syndromes in the medical literature or in gene specific variation databases. This variant is listed in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) with an overall population frequency of 0.02 percent (identified on 56 out of 276,584 chromosomes). Based on these observations, the p.Cys82Cys variant is likely to be benign. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 08, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 06, 2015 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 12, 2022 | - - |
FLCN-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 17, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at