rs150757822
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.5975A>C(p.Lys1992Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000216 in 1,590,620 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. K1992R) has been classified as Uncertain significance. The gene ATM is included in the ClinGen Criteria Specification Registry.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000051.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000051.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATM | MANE Select | c.5975A>C | p.Lys1992Thr | missense | Exon 40 of 63 | ENSP00000501606.1 | Q13315 | ||
| ATM | TSL:1 | c.5975A>C | p.Lys1992Thr | missense | Exon 41 of 64 | ENSP00000388058.2 | Q13315 | ||
| ATM | TSL:1 | n.*1039A>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 38 of 61 | ENSP00000435747.2 | E9PIN0 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000250 AC: 38AN: 152246Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000362 AC: 91AN: 251040 AF XY: 0.000361 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000213 AC: 306AN: 1438256Hom.: 2 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.000211 AC XY: 151AN XY: 716890 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000249 AC: 38AN: 152364Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000295 AC XY: 22AN XY: 74508 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at