rs150777839
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_020632.3(ATP6V0A4):c.2035G>T(p.Asp679Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00666 in 1,614,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 58 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020632.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP6V0A4 | NM_020632.3 | c.2035G>T | p.Asp679Tyr | missense_variant | 19/22 | ENST00000310018.7 | NP_065683.2 | |
ATP6V0A4 | NM_130840.3 | c.2035G>T | p.Asp679Tyr | missense_variant | 18/21 | NP_570855.2 | ||
ATP6V0A4 | NM_130841.3 | c.2035G>T | p.Asp679Tyr | missense_variant | 18/21 | NP_570856.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP6V0A4 | ENST00000310018.7 | c.2035G>T | p.Asp679Tyr | missense_variant | 19/22 | 1 | NM_020632.3 | ENSP00000308122.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00517 AC: 787AN: 152182Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00606 AC: 1523AN: 251434Hom.: 13 AF XY: 0.00656 AC XY: 891AN XY: 135890
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00681 AC: 9962AN: 1461868Hom.: 52 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00694 AC XY: 5050AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00517 AC: 788AN: 152300Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00500 AC XY: 372AN XY: 74468
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 20, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24252324, 28233610, 16611712, 27884173) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2023 | ATP6V0A4: BP4, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 18, 2022 | Variant summary: ATP6V0A4 c.2035G>T (p.Asp679Tyr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0061 in 251434 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 5.4 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ATP6V0A4 causing Renal Tubular Acidosis, Distal, Autosomal Recessive phenotype (0.0011), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Autosomal recessive distal renal tubular acidosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at