rs150814269
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1
The NM_001077365.2(POMT1):c.1698C>T(p.Ser566Ser) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000721 in 1,609,454 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001077365.2 splice_region, synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POMT1 | NM_001077365.2 | c.1698C>T | p.Ser566Ser | splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant | 17/20 | ENST00000402686.8 | NP_001070833.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POMT1 | ENST00000402686.8 | c.1698C>T | p.Ser566Ser | splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant | 17/20 | 1 | NM_001077365.2 | ENSP00000385797.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00298 AC: 453AN: 152200Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000958 AC: 240AN: 250422Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000760 AC XY: 103AN XY: 135552
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000485 AC: 707AN: 1457136Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000432 AC XY: 313AN XY: 725236
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00298 AC: 454AN: 152318Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00281 AC XY: 209AN XY: 74492
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 16, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Apr 27, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jun 24, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2023 | POMT1: BP4, BP7, BS1 - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 01, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 27, 2014 | - - |
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2K Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Walker-Warburg congenital muscular dystrophy;C1836373:Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2K;C5436962:Muscular dystrophy-dystroglycanopathy (congenital with intellectual disability), type B1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at