rs150822759
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 3P and 1B. PM1PP5BP4
The NM_206933.4(USH2A):c.10999A>C(p.Thr3667Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000905 in 1,613,660 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T3667T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_206933.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Usher syndrome type 2AInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Usher syndrome type 2Inheritance: Unknown, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- retinitis pigmentosa 39Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- retinitis pigmentosaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_206933.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000855 AC: 13AN: 152086Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000107 AC: 27AN: 251430 AF XY: 0.000125 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000903 AC: 132AN: 1461456Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000825 AC XY: 60AN XY: 727032 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000920 AC: 14AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000134 AC XY: 10AN XY: 74410 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at