Menu
GeneBe

rs150831576

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001365951.3(KIF1B):c.2874C>T(p.Asp958=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000757 in 1,614,130 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00069 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00076 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

KIF1B
NM_001365951.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.364
Variant links:
Genes affected
KIF1B (HGNC:16636): (kinesin family member 1B) Predicted to enable microtubule binding activity and plus-end-directed microtubule motor activity. Predicted to be involved in chemical synaptic transmission; dense core granule cytoskeletal transport; and vesicle-mediated transport. Predicted to act upstream of or within mitochondrion transport along microtubule. Predicted to be located in cytoplasmic vesicle membrane and neuron projection. Predicted to be part of kinesin complex. Predicted to be active in several cellular components, including axon; dendrite; and microtubule. Implicated in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2A1; carcinoma (multiple); multiple sclerosis; neuroblastoma; and pheochromocytoma. Biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.4).
BP6
Variant 1-10326309-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-10326309-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 291563.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-10326309-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.364 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000764 (1117/1461850) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0202 (800/39658). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.019. There are 11 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 548 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 106 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
KIF1BNM_001365951.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2874C>T p.Asp958= synonymous_variant 27/49 ENST00000676179.1
KIF1BNM_001365952.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.2874C>T p.Asp958= synonymous_variant 27/49
KIF1BNM_015074.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2736C>T p.Asp912= synonymous_variant 25/47

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
KIF1BENST00000676179.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.2874C>T p.Asp958= synonymous_variant 27/49 NM_001365951.3 P1O60333-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000697
AC:
106
AN:
152162
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0164
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00161
AC:
405
AN:
251148
Hom.:
4
AF XY:
0.00154
AC XY:
209
AN XY:
135758
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0181
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000277
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000494
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000978
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000764
AC:
1117
AN:
1461850
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000754
AC XY:
548
AN XY:
727228
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0202
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000197
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000468
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000210
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000580
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000690
AC:
105
AN:
152280
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000739
AC XY:
55
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0162
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000272
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000895
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00404
AC:
15
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 03, 2020This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre-- -
Neuroblastoma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 06, 2024- -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJul 02, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.40
Cadd
Benign
7.0
Dann
Benign
0.73

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.090
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150831576; hg19: chr1-10386367; API