rs150877886

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_080680.3(COL11A2):​c.2336C>T​(p.Pro779Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00204 in 1,612,892 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P779S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 ( 1 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0021 ( 22 hom. )

Consequence

COL11A2
NM_080680.3 missense

Scores

2
5
10

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.77

Publications

14 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL11A2 (HGNC:2187): (collagen type XI alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes one of the two alpha chains of type XI collagen, a minor fibrillar collagen. It is located on chromosome 6 very close to but separate from the gene for retinoid X receptor beta. Type XI collagen is a heterotrimer but the third alpha chain is a post-translationally modified alpha 1 type II chain. Proteolytic processing of this type XI chain produces PARP, a proline/arginine-rich protein that is an amino terminal domain. Mutations in this gene are associated with type III Stickler syndrome, otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia (OSMED syndrome), Weissenbacher-Zweymuller syndrome, autosomal dominant non-syndromic sensorineural type 13 deafness (DFNA13), and autosomal recessive non-syndromic sensorineural type 53 deafness (DFNB53). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. A related pseudogene is located nearby on chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]
COL11A2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 13
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominant
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 53
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
  • otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • fibrochondrogenesis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0162341).
BP6
Variant 6-33175614-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-33175614-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 196635.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00172 (262/152136) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00685 (33/4816). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00501. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 138 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 22 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
COL11A2NM_080680.3 linkc.2336C>T p.Pro779Leu missense_variant Exon 30 of 66 ENST00000341947.7 NP_542411.2 P13942A0A0C4DFS1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COL11A2ENST00000341947.7 linkc.2336C>T p.Pro779Leu missense_variant Exon 30 of 66 5 NM_080680.3 ENSP00000339915.2 A0A0C4DFS1
COL11A2ENST00000374708.8 linkc.2078C>T p.Pro693Leu missense_variant Exon 28 of 64 5 ENSP00000363840.4 Q4VXY6
COL11A2ENST00000361917.6 linkc.908C>T p.Pro303Leu missense_variant Exon 17 of 24 5 ENSP00000355123.2 H0YIS1
COL11A2ENST00000477772.1 linkn.272+1395C>T intron_variant Intron 5 of 8 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00172
AC:
261
AN:
152018
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000411
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00386
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00685
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00431
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00259
AC:
638
AN:
246358
AF XY:
0.00299
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000529
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00444
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00120
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000328
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000463
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00543
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00207
AC:
3028
AN:
1460756
Hom.:
22
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00221
AC XY:
1605
AN XY:
726696
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000478
AC:
16
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00483
AC:
216
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00119
AC:
31
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000202
AC:
8
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00643
AC:
555
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000956
AC:
5
AN:
52300
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0111
AC:
64
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00176
AC:
1956
AN:
1112004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00293
AC:
177
AN:
60386
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
191
382
574
765
956
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
78
156
234
312
390
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00172
AC:
262
AN:
152136
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00186
AC XY:
138
AN XY:
74384
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000410
AC:
17
AN:
41480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00386
AC:
59
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000576
AC:
2
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5156
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00685
AC:
33
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10594
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0136
AC:
4
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00203
AC:
138
AN:
68000
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00426
AC:
9
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
14
29
43
58
72
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00202
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00220
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000809
AC:
3
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00156
AC:
6
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000662
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00185
AC:
10
ExAC
AF:
0.00303
AC:
359
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00375
AC:
13
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00262
EpiControl
AF:
0.00326

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Mar 03, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

May 05, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 20, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Pro779Leu in exon 30 of COL11A2: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 0.76% (87/11452) Latino chromoso mes, in 0.69% (112/16264) South Asian chromosomes, and in 0.23% (143/63200) Eur opean Chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium Sequencing Project (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs150877886). -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
Jan 31, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nov 15, 2016
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

COL11A2: BS1, BS2 -

Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal recessive Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Stickler Syndrome, Dominant Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Fibrochondrogenesis 2 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.084
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.19
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.050
CADD
Uncertain
23
DANN
Benign
0.93
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.093
T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.097
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.049
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.90
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.60
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.016
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.079
T
PhyloP100
2.8
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.57
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-6.7
D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.57
Sift
Benign
0.28
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.21
T;T;T
Vest4
0.58
MVP
0.79
MPC
0.99
ClinPred
0.054
T
GERP RS
3.4
gMVP
0.47
Mutation Taster
=62/38
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150877886; hg19: chr6-33143391; COSMIC: COSV59493064; COSMIC: COSV59493064; API