rs150935953

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_000124.4(ERCC6):​c.670C>T​(p.Leu224Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000188 in 1,602,794 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L224L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00018 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC6
NM_000124.4 missense

Scores

1
9
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.73

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERCC6 (HGNC:3438): (ERCC excision repair 6, chromatin remodeling factor) This gene encodes a DNA-binding protein that is important in transcription-coupled excision repair. The encoded protein has ATP-stimulated ATPase activity, interacts with several transcription and excision repair proteins, and may promote complex formation at DNA repair sites. Mutations in this gene are associated with Cockayne syndrome type B and cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 1. Alternative splicing occurs between a splice site from exon 5 of this gene to the 3' splice site upstream of the open reading frame (ORF) of the adjacent gene, piggyback-derived-3 (GeneID:267004), which activates the alternative polyadenylation site downstream of the piggyback-derived-3 ORF. The resulting transcripts encode a fusion protein that shares sequence with the product of each individual gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2016]
ERCC6 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Cockayne spectrum with or without cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Cockayne syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Myriad Women’s Health, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • UV-sensitive syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • COFS syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • UV-sensitive syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • premature ovarian failure 11
    Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011666805).
BP6
Variant 10-49524760-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-49524760-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 190174.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ERCC6NM_000124.4 linkc.670C>T p.Leu224Phe missense_variant Exon 5 of 21 ENST00000355832.10 NP_000115.1 Q03468-1Q59FF6
ERCC6NM_001277058.2 linkc.670C>T p.Leu224Phe missense_variant Exon 5 of 6 ENST00000447839.7 NP_001263987.1 P0DP91-1A8K4Q3
ERCC6NM_001346440.2 linkc.670C>T p.Leu224Phe missense_variant Exon 5 of 21 NP_001333369.1 Q03468-1
ERCC6NM_001277059.2 linkc.670C>T p.Leu224Phe missense_variant Exon 5 of 6 NP_001263988.1 P0DP91-1A8K4Q3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ERCC6ENST00000355832.10 linkc.670C>T p.Leu224Phe missense_variant Exon 5 of 21 1 NM_000124.4 ENSP00000348089.5 Q03468-1
ERCC6ENST00000447839.7 linkc.670C>T p.Leu224Phe missense_variant Exon 5 of 6 2 NM_001277058.2 ENSP00000387966.2 P0DP91-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000243
AC:
37
AN:
152122
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00662
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000349
AC:
84
AN:
240394
AF XY:
0.000328
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00609
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000117
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000499
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000183
AC:
265
AN:
1450554
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000193
AC XY:
139
AN XY:
722052
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000597
AC:
2
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000179
AC:
8
AN:
44712
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00627
AC:
164
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000696
AC:
6
AN:
86252
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
42242
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000867
AC:
5
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000504
AC:
56
AN:
1111948
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000398
AC:
24
AN:
60326
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
19
37
56
74
93
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000243
AC:
37
AN:
152240
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000215
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
74428
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000241
AC:
1
AN:
41538
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000653
AC:
1
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00662
AC:
23
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5144
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10598
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000162
AC:
11
AN:
68036
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.475
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
5
8
10
13
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000323
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000215
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000233
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.000264
AC:
32
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Dec 31, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

ERCC6: PM2 -

Apr 26, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Uncertain:1
Dec 03, 2012
Claritas Genomics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Age related macular degeneration 5 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Cockayne syndrome type 2 Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Sep 25, 2022
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.13
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.0024
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.010
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.28
T;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.48
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.42
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.87
D;.;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.14
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.012
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.36
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.5
M;.;.
PhyloP100
7.7
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.64
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.8
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.27
Sift
Benign
0.080
T;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.070
T;T;T
Polyphen
1.0
D;.;.
Vest4
0.46
MVP
0.91
MPC
0.54
ClinPred
0.076
T
GERP RS
5.1
Varity_R
0.11
gMVP
0.20
Mutation Taster
=39/61
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150935953; hg19: chr10-50732806; COSMIC: COSV105916867; API