Menu
GeneBe

rs150961505

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_006891.4(CRYGD):c.63C>T(p.Ser21=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000575 in 1,610,866 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00065 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00057 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CRYGD
NM_006891.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.778
Variant links:
Genes affected
CRYGD (HGNC:2411): (crystallin gamma D) Crystallins are separated into two classes: taxon-specific, or enzyme, and ubiquitous. The latter class constitutes the major proteins of vertebrate eye lens and maintains the transparency and refractive index of the lens. Since lens central fiber cells lose their nuclei during development, these crystallins are made and then retained throughout life, making them extremely stable proteins. Mammalian lens crystallins are divided into alpha, beta, and gamma families; beta and gamma crystallins are also considered as a superfamily. Alpha and beta families are further divided into acidic and basic groups. Seven protein regions exist in crystallins: four homologous motifs, a connecting peptide, and N- and C-terminal extensions. Gamma-crystallins are a homogeneous group of highly symmetrical, monomeric proteins typically lacking connecting peptides and terminal extensions. They are differentially regulated after early development. Four gamma-crystallin genes (gamma-A through gamma-D) and three pseudogenes (gamma-E, gamma-F, gamma-G) are tandemly organized in a genomic segment as a gene cluster. Whether due to aging or mutations in specific genes, gamma-crystallins have been involved in cataract formation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.34).
BP6
Variant 2-208124301-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-208124301-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 468229.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-208124301-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.778 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00065 (99/152368) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00119 (81/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000981. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 42 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 99 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CRYGDNM_006891.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.63C>T p.Ser21= synonymous_variant 2/3 ENST00000264376.5
LOC100507443NR_038437.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.97+5076G>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CRYGDENST00000264376.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.63C>T p.Ser21= synonymous_variant 2/31 NM_006891.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000650
AC:
99
AN:
152250
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00374
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000282
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000646
AC:
155
AN:
240020
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000635
AC XY:
83
AN XY:
130722
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000210
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00309
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000561
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000678
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000954
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000683
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000568
AC:
828
AN:
1458498
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000622
AC XY:
451
AN XY:
725300
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000120
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00369
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000912
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000581
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000565
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000650
AC:
99
AN:
152368
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000564
AC XY:
42
AN XY:
74504
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000240
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00374
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000282
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.00119
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000465

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cataract 4 multiple types Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2022CRYGD: BS1, BS2 -
Aculeiform cataract Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeNov 16, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.34
Cadd
Benign
12
Dann
Benign
0.95

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150961505; hg19: chr2-208989025; API