rs151036570
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_002473.6(MYH9):c.2872G>A(p.Ala958Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000945 in 1,613,440 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00060 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00098 ( 3 hom. )
Consequence
MYH9
NM_002473.6 missense
NM_002473.6 missense
Scores
1
8
10
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 6.13
Genes affected
MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), MYH9. . Gene score misZ 3.473 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 6.1231 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with May-Hegglin anomaly, autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss, macrothrombocytopenia and granulocyte inclusions with or without nephritis or sensorineural hearing loss, autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.04144463).
BP6
Variant 22-36300231-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36300231-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 164446.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000604 (92/152304) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00116 (79/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000955. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 38 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 92 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYH9 | NM_002473.6 | c.2872G>A | p.Ala958Thr | missense_variant | 23/41 | ENST00000216181.11 | NP_002464.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYH9 | ENST00000216181.11 | c.2872G>A | p.Ala958Thr | missense_variant | 23/41 | 1 | NM_002473.6 | ENSP00000216181 | P1 | |
MYH9 | ENST00000685801.1 | c.2935G>A | p.Ala979Thr | missense_variant | 24/42 | ENSP00000510688 | ||||
MYH9 | ENST00000691109.1 | n.3167G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 17/35 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000605 AC: 92AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
92
AN:
152188
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000738 AC: 185AN: 250654Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000708 AC XY: 96AN XY: 135602
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
185
AN:
250654
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
96
AN XY:
135602
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000981 AC: 1433AN: 1461136Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000978 AC XY: 711AN XY: 726900
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1433
AN:
1461136
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
711
AN XY:
726900
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000604 AC: 92AN: 152304Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000510 AC XY: 38AN XY: 74480
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
92
AN:
152304
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
38
AN XY:
74480
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
12
ExAC
AF:
AC:
108
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 05, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 24, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29090586, 30349881, 29958610) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2024 | MYH9: BS1 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 06, 2023 | - - |
MYH9-related disorder Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 15, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Macrothrombocytopenia and granulocyte inclusions with or without nephritis or sensorineural hearing loss Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | ISTH-SSC Genomics in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, KU Leuven, Center for Molecular and Vascular Biology | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 05, 2015 | p.Ala958Thr in exon 23 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 0.2% (102/66426) of European chrom osomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org ; dbSNP rs151036570). In addition, this variant has been previously identified by our laboratory in two individuals with hearing loss that could be explained b y pathogenic variants in other genes, as well as in an unaffected parent. - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
D
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L
MutationTaster
Benign
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T
Sift4G
Benign
T
Polyphen
B
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at