rs151056947

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001080463.2(DYNC2H1):c.10500C>G(p.Leu3500Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00226 in 1,611,358 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 81 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 46 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 35 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC2H1
NM_001080463.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.748

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

DYNC2H1 (HGNC:2962): (dynein cytoplasmic 2 heavy chain 1) This gene encodes a large cytoplasmic dynein protein that is involved in retrograde transport in the cilium and has a role in intraflagellar transport, a process required for ciliary/flagellar assembly. Mutations in this gene cause a heterogeneous spectrum of conditions related to altered primary cilium function and often involve polydactyly, abnormal skeletogenesis, and polycystic kidneys. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct proteins. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]

DYNC2H1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
Jeune syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
short rib-polydactyly syndrome, Majewski type
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
short rib-polydactyly syndrome, Verma-Naumoff type
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

DYNC2H1 links:

ENSG00000285878 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000285878 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).

BP6

Variant 11-103257625-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-103257625-C-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 302093.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.748 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0124 (1884/152238) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.043 (1785/41530). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0413. There are 46 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 879 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 46 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DYNC2H1	NM_001080463.2 link	c.10500C>G	p.Leu3500Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 70 of 90	ENST00000650373.2	NP_001073932.1	Q8NCM8-2
DYNC2H1	NM_001377.3 link	c.10479C>G	p.Leu3493Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 69 of 89	ENST00000375735.7	NP_001368.2	Q8NCM8-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DYNC2H1	ENST00000650373.2 link	c.10500C>G	p.Leu3500Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 70 of 90		NM_001080463.2	ENSP00000497174.1	Q8NCM8-2
DYNC2H1	ENST00000375735.7 link	c.10479C>G	p.Leu3493Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 69 of 89	1	NM_001377.3	ENSP00000364887.2	Q8NCM8-1
DYNC2H1	ENST00000334267.11 link	c.2205+123206C>G		intron_variant	Intron 15 of 19	1		ENSP00000334021.7	Q8NCM8-3
ENSG00000285878	ENST00000649070.1 link	n.691-5321G>C		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0124

AC:

1884

AN:

152120

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0431

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00491

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00717

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00309

AC:

765

AN:

247756

AF XY:

0.00210

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0429

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00258

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000800

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000834

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00120

AC:

1753

AN:

1459120

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00102

AC XY:

739

AN XY:

725830

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0423

AC:

1413

AN:

33386

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00278

AC:

124

AN:

44568

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26070

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39580

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000151

AC:

AN:

85814

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53302

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000695

AC:

AN:

5758

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000369

AC:

AN:

1110390

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00262

AC:

158

AN:

60252

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.470

Heterozygous variant carriers

156

233

311

389

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

150

200

250

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0124

AC:

1884

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0118

AC XY:

879

AN XY:

74430

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0430

AC:

1785

AN:

41530

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00490

AC:

AN:

15292

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4820

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10598

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

292

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000132

AC:

AN:

68024

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00710

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.502

Heterozygous variant carriers

184

277

369

461

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00108

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0141

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00260

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Jeune thoracic dystrophy

Benign:2

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Oct 16, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Jul 03, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.75

CADD

Benign

0.39

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.56

PhyloP100

-0.75

Mutation Taster

=98/2

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over