rs151056947

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001080463.2(DYNC2H1):c.10500C>G(p.Leu3500=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00226 in 1,611,358 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 81 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 46 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 35 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC2H1
NM_001080463.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.748

Variant links:

Genes affected

DYNC2H1 (HGNC:2962): (dynein cytoplasmic 2 heavy chain 1) This gene encodes a large cytoplasmic dynein protein that is involved in retrograde transport in the cilium and has a role in intraflagellar transport, a process required for ciliary/flagellar assembly. Mutations in this gene cause a heterogeneous spectrum of conditions related to altered primary cilium function and often involve polydactyly, abnormal skeletogenesis, and polycystic kidneys. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct proteins. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]

DYNC2H1 links:

(HGNC:):

links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).

BP6

Variant 11-103257625-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-103257625-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 302093.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-103257625-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.748 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0124 (1884/152238) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.043 (1785/41530). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0413. There are 46 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 879 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 46 AR,Digenic gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DYNC2H1	NM_001080463.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.10500C>G	p.Leu3500=	synonymous_variant	70/90	ENST00000650373.2	NP_001073932.1
DYNC2H1	NM_001377.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.10479C>G	p.Leu3493=	synonymous_variant	69/89	ENST00000375735.7	NP_001368.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DYNC2H1	ENST00000650373.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.10500C>G	p.Leu3500=	synonymous_variant	70/90		NM_001080463.2	ENSP00000497174	A1	Q8NCM8-2
DYNC2H1	ENST00000375735.7 linkuse as main transcript	c.10479C>G	p.Leu3493=	synonymous_variant	69/89	1	NM_001377.3	ENSP00000364887	P3	Q8NCM8-1
DYNC2H1	ENST00000334267.11 linkuse as main transcript	c.2205+123206C>G		intron_variant		1		ENSP00000334021		Q8NCM8-3
	ENST00000649070.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.691-5321G>C		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0124

AC:

1884

AN:

152120

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0431

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00491

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00717

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00309

AC:

765

AN:

247756

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00210

AC XY:

283

AN XY:

134472

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0429

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00258

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000986

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000800

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000834

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00120

AC:

1753

AN:

1459120

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00102

AC XY:

739

AN XY:

725830

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0423

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00278

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000151

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000369

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00262

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0124

AC:

1884

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0118

AC XY:

879

AN XY:

74430

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0430

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00490

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00710

Alfa

AF:

0.00108

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0141

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00260

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Jeune thoracic dystrophy

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jun 14, 2016	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 31, 2024	- -

Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Nov 29, 2023	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Jul 03, 2017

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

not provided

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.75

CADD

Benign

0.39

DANN

Benign

0.56

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over